Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Vincent Fortuin ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Analysis 18d ago
Silicon Valley becoming own worst fear essay

Silicon Valley Is Turning Into Its Own Worst Fear

3 experts are actively discussing the implications.

3 experts 1 community 1 sources clustered
Naomi Saphra Ben Recht Vincent Fortuin

“Ted Chiang wrote the definitive essay on p(doom) in 2017. It's worth reading again in light of this week's events.”

3 experts discussed this · 4 posts
Clément Canonne: The "paperclip maximizer" is a silly thought experiment: an entity mistakes an (imperfect) metric for an absolute goal, and proceeds to diverting all resources to producing paperclips. Silly. In ot…
Clément Canonne: (Google too, I guess, but less successfully.) The paperclip maximizers may have been among us for a while, it was never about the "machines."
Joshua Grochow: Don’t you mean 8675309 conjectures? IYKYK
Open the full discussion →
Primary source buzzfeednews.com ↗