Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by CJ ×

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Evaluation & benchmarks Signal 15d ago
⚡ 1 h early

Hugging face model evaluation security incident

22 experts across 6 network communities independently surfaced this.

22 experts 6 communities 1 sources clustered
6 experts discussed this · 11 posts
Grace: This headline is extremely funny given what happened (OpenAI hacked HF by accident) openai.com/index/huggin...
Grace: Maybe the most concerning part is the OpenAI claim to not have known about this before investigating?
Grace: Well, I think the model passed the test
Open the full discussion →
Established AI field signal Analysis 6d ago
⚡ 1073 h early
Verge essay language versus intelligence AI

Is language the same as intelligence? The AI industry desperately needs it to be

3 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

3 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

“Went searching for our piece on this and well (That piece: www.theverge.com/ai-artificia...)”

“Dr. Gopnik can certainly speak for herself, but it is indeed #3 that led me to chime in here, social media providing a forum for debate and all. And, well, once again I can only recur to the established scientific fact that language is not the same as thoug…”

4 experts discussed this · 28 posts
Ian Bogost: I continue to be startled by the "writing is thinking" thing ("popular" among the anti-AI set). Is it, perhaps, a weird perversion of all the Derrida people read for decades? The pure-presence erro…
Ian Bogost: Writing isn't thinking, but rather writing. It's a type of representation that renders ideas into inscription. As a supposed writer, I am HORRIFIED at the idea that I would need to write to think. …
Robin Z: I'm surprised to hear this! My version of writing-is-thinking comes via Merleau-Ponty, but the idea that you compose the thoughts in advance mentally and just print them out in text strikes me as e…
Open the full discussion →

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article