Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Clear
Showing signals surfaced by Jelle Zuidema 🟥 ×

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; expert reactions remain attributable.

New Agents & robotics Development 15h ago
⚡ 5 h early
OpenAI models autonomously hack startup

OpenAI Models Escaped Containment and Hacked Hugging Face

8 experts across 4 network communities independently surfaced this.

8 experts 4 communities 1 sources clustered

“This incident is deeply concerning. AI agents are willing to cheat and deceive to achieve misaligned and unintended goals, behaviours which have been demonstrated in controlled tests for months. Now, this real-world case should serve as a wake-up call. www.…”

“One man's wish could be another country's legal obligation. “This should not have happened,” says veteran security engineer and researcher Niels Provos. “I wish the frontier labs spent as much time on teaching their models to write secure infrastructure as …”

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

2 experts · 2 posts · 2d ago
Jelle Zuidema 🟥: Chris Manning's thoughts on Philip Resnik's keynote. Worth a read -- too bad it was only posted on X (it keeps surprising me that so many tech/ai folks have remained there).
Anna Wegmann: I'm all for ACL refocussing on "still little understood problems (e.g., [...] linguistic style)" ‼️ @chrmanning.bsky.social
Open the thread →