Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Questions & unknowns reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Questions & unknowns Research & technical analysis
1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Reaction converging arXiv.org e-Print archive Research & technical analysis · 6 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Zachary Lipton ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Resource 11d ago
⚡ 87 h early
arxiv preprint archive resource

arXiv.org e-Print archive

8 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Questions & unknowns reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Zachary Lipton
“Just me or does @ChatGPT search the most random websites no matter the query? If I ask for the best bagel, it will “Searching ” + {https://t.co/vEQ6I1WmCF, https://t.co/5JR1Db9NqB, …}” evidence ↗
8 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Zachary Lipton Eugene Vinitsky Ted Underwood Ramon Astudillo Alison Gopnik Ben Schmidt Mandana Samiei Federico Pianzola
How the network is reacting 5 experts are independently emphasizing research & technical analysis.
Reaction converging

Research & technical analysis

5 experts

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“arxiv.org, doi.org, biorxiv.org, medrxiv.org, pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, nature.com, science.org, pnas.org, semanticscholar.org, openreview.net”

Questions & unknowns

1 expert

What remains unresolved or contested.

“Just me or does @ChatGPT search the most random websites no matter the query? If I ask for the best bagel, it will “Searching ” + {https://t.co/vEQ6I1WmCF, https://t.co/5JR1Db9NqB, …}”

4 experts discussed this · 6 posts
Ted Underwood: I just eliminated 22 tabs by doing this: osascript -e 'tell application "Google Chrome" to get URL of every tab of front window' | tr ',' '\n' | grep arxiv.org list of urls -> LLM -> annotated read…
Ted Underwood: did I come up with that idea by myself? no I did not
Karandeep Singh: Any suggestions for the other 478 tabs?
Open the full discussion →
Primary source arxiv.org ↗