Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Dr Zena Assaad ×

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Signal 3d ago

We Have Always Been Action TheoristsToward

2 experts are actively discussing the implications.

3 experts 1 community 1 sources clustered

“Of interest to some folks here, Lauren Goodlad on LLM text, literary theory and stochastic parrots — (Goodlad is the editor of @criticalai-journal.bsky.social) : online.ucpress.edu/representati...”

“g/g online.ucpress.edu/representati...”

2 experts discussed this · 3 posts
Eryk Salvaggio: Of interest to some folks here, Lauren Goodlad on LLM text, literary theory and stochastic parrots — (Goodlad is the editor of @criticalai-journal.bsky.social) : online.ucpress.edu/representati...
Eryk Salvaggio: Engages significantly with @mkirschenbaum.bsky.social et al’s “Again Theory,” which I’ve often been looking at myself this year critinq.wordpress.com/2023/06/27/a...
Matthew Kirschenbaum: Yes, I just read it with interest (as they say).
Open the full discussion →