Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Building & implementation reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Building & implementation
0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Most important

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

New Safety & security Analysis 7h ago
US open-weight models global AI safety essay

US Leadership on Open-Weight Models is Key to Global AI Safety

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Building & implementation reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Tech Policy Press
“The US should make it a national priority to develop safer open-weight models, says Simon Hedlin—or they will cede the global ecosystem to China.” evidence ↗
1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered
Tech Policy Press

“The US should make it a national priority to develop safer open-weight models, says Simon Hedlin—or they will cede the global ecosystem to China.”

Primary source techpolicy.press ↗
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

5 experts · 27 posts · 1d ago
Maxim Raginsky Ryan Moulton Colin tweety fish Marco Z
Matches Building & implementation
“I mean I almost think we need a couple different words here because that I would call "guardrails" or idk "harness engineering" or whatever, and is pretty disjoint from "we want to build this so it…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 2 Research & technical analysis · 1
tweety fish: here is a succinct thing I can say: "alignment"-style AI safety risks DO NOT EXIST or need remediation with LLMs as such (there are lots of other problems) and OpenAI and Anthropic are in the busin…
tweety fish: like this, I think, maybe sounds weird, but is in a strong sense literally true.
Open the thread →
2 experts · 46 posts · 17h ago
Grace B! 🐝 Cavello (they/them)
Matches Building & implementation
“What do we do about this? Substack lets you check for AI with pangram, but it doesn’t show a label upfront. I assume if it started doing that authors would optimize against it. Maybe build it into …” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Building & implementation · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Grace: AI writing, unfortunately
Grace: What do we do about this? Substack lets you check for AI with pangram, but it doesn’t show a label upfront. I assume if it started doing that authors would optimize against it. Maybe build it into …
Open the thread →