Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Building & implementation reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Building & implementation
0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

New & accelerating

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

New Safety & security Signal 14h ago

Why the Global AI Safety Agenda Cannot See African Harms

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Building & implementation reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Justin Hendrix
“Liz Orembo argues AI risk is relational—it "does not reside in code alone." A model can pass every frontier safety test and still cause harm when deployed into different languages, institutions and social realities. That matters, in particular, for Africa.” evidence ↗
1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered
Justin Hendrix

“Liz Orembo argues AI risk is relational—it "does not reside in code alone." A model can pass every frontier safety test and still cause harm when deployed into different languages, institutions and social realities. That matters, in particular, for Africa.”

Primary source techpolicy.press ↗
New Safety & security Signal 17h ago

Why the Global AI Safety Agenda Cannot See African Harms

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Building & implementation reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Tech Policy Press
“Liz Orembo argues AI risk is relational—it "does not reside in code alone." A model can pass every frontier safety test and still cause harm when deployed into different languages, institutions and social realities. That matters, in particular, for Africa.” evidence ↗
1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered
Tech Policy Press

“Liz Orembo argues AI risk is relational—it "does not reside in code alone." A model can pass every frontier safety test and still cause harm when deployed into different languages, institutions and social realities. That matters, in particular, for Africa.”

Primary source techpolicy.press ↗
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

2 experts · 20 posts · 5h ago
Pwnallthethings SE Gyges
Matches Building & implementation
“sorry, "there is a letter today, of whom by far the most famous person who signed it was dario, that says we should 'pace' as in 'slow down' ai development"” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Policy & governance · 1 Opportunity & adoption · 1
SE Gyges: here's who signed both the Pacing the Frontier letter released today and the Pause AI letter in 2023 demanding an end to all research for six months also, raw counts for "signed today's letter" and…
SE Gyges: fundamentally this is an anthropic thing that managed to recruit some people from other companies
Open the thread →