Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Concern & critique
0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

8 experts · 32 posts · 1d ago
Mark Riedl Jeffrey P. Bigham Tim Kellogg Michael Ekstrand David Picard Lionel Jonathan Stray Singularity's Bounty e/cc
Matches Concern & critique
“Harnesses are lightweight. But the harness needs to call back to its model. It hasn’t really escaped then. One knows exactly where the model is and shut it down the harness or the model or block th…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Questions & unknowns · 2 Concern & critique · 1 Building & implementation · 1
Mark Riedl: Do openAI and Anthropic employees not understand how computers work.
Mark Riedl: Any competent IT professional: Hey boss, what is this 8TB file doing on our server, and why is it executing continuously on 3TB of VRAM? Any competent IT manager: what ever it is, shut it down.
Open the thread →
6 experts · 37 posts · 23h ago
Anthony Moser Amanda Tepski Jess Miers 🦝🦞 Jed Brown Amy Hoy Singularity's Bounty e/cc
Matches Concern & critique
“Definitely. I warn my students about this too. I don't worry about the C- lawsuit who barely survived law school using AI. I'm worried about the gunners who know both the law and how to weaponize t…” evidence ↗
Reaction converging Policy & governance · 4 Opportunity & adoption · 1
Amanda Tepski: In rebuttal to “legal? ai is getting there” I offer www.damiencharlotin.com/hallucinatio...
Jed Brown: And beyond law, is a 67% error rate good for medicine? Is it normal medical practice to suppress data misconduct and 10 independent whistleblowers? It's only "getting there" when conditions to bypa…
Open the thread →
3 experts · 16 posts · 2d ago
VE, cybersocial occult investigator austin jeremymorrell.dev
Matches Concern & critique
“And if you set aside the market maximalism (and the other broad array of social and political harms), that should be a fine thing. It's not compatible with the way this is being sold as "the do eve…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Building & implementation · 2 Questions & unknowns · 1
austin: some thoughts - there’s a fucking cambrian explosion of software but it’s invisible because it’s personal. github isn’t getting hugged every other week for nothin’
austin: - the software you see on your phone and in the world is the product of organizations, and organizations move s l o w l y. developers are significantly more productive but it doesn’t matter if that…
Open the thread →
2 experts · 6 posts · 1d ago
Ryan Moulton Phillip Carter
Matches Concern & critique
“Please be a better critic. What's more likely? A magic chain of events over years results in a slop artist who doesn't do anything controlling the world's most powerful company and doing nothing, p…” evidence ↗
Phillip Carter: I mean, that's how almost everyone gets powerful or even mildly successful. The reality is that he _cofounded_ openai, and while not a researcher I think it's beyond silly to believe he doesn't do …
Phillip Carter: Mmmm, yes, a CEO who does nothing, with outside money that (magically) makes things that do nothing that nobody wants and yet it's arguably _the_ prevailing thing in our society right now? My broth…
Open the thread →
2 experts · 5 posts · 2d ago
Ben Recht Hagen Blix
Matches Concern & critique
“I've been told about engineers who go "Idk how to do anything about climate change, but I do know how to deal with this, so I'm working on stopping the AI from going rogue" more than once. It's not…” evidence ↗
Ben Recht: That guy claims to be a climate scientist... no idea what he's doing there.
Hagen Blix: As someone who's written a fair bit about climate problems being projected onto AI, I assume the intent was to point out... well... that?
Open the thread →