Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

New AI research Analysis 5h ago
AI bioweapons biosecurity warning essay

Newly created viruses are a warning. We still have a window to stop AI-enabled bioweapons

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · RAND Corporation
“"Nature is the world's worst bioterrorist." This saying in the field of biosecurity conveys the idea that naturally emerging pathogens cause more deaths than any biological attack. But that trope may soon be outdated, says RAND's Steph Guerra. https://t.co/…” evidence ↗
1 expert 0 communities 1 sources clustered

“"Nature is the world's worst bioterrorist." This saying in the field of biosecurity conveys the idea that naturally emerging pathogens cause more deaths than any biological attack. But that trope may soon be outdated, says RAND's Steph Guerra. https://t.co/…”

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

8 experts · 32 posts · 1d ago
Matches Concern & critique
“Harnesses are lightweight. But the harness needs to call back to its model. It hasn’t really escaped then. One knows exactly where the model is and shut it down the harness or the model or block th…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Questions & unknowns · 2 Concern & critique · 1 Building & implementation · 1
Mark Riedl: Do openAI and Anthropic employees not understand how computers work.
Mark Riedl: Any competent IT professional: Hey boss, what is this 8TB file doing on our server, and why is it executing continuously on 3TB of VRAM? Any competent IT manager: what ever it is, shut it down.
Open the thread →
6 experts · 37 posts · 23h ago
Matches Concern & critique
“Definitely. I warn my students about this too. I don't worry about the C- lawsuit who barely survived law school using AI. I'm worried about the gunners who know both the law and how to weaponize t…” evidence ↗
Reaction converging Policy & governance · 4 Opportunity & adoption · 1
Amanda Tepski: In rebuttal to “legal? ai is getting there” I offer www.damiencharlotin.com/hallucinatio...
Jed Brown: And beyond law, is a 67% error rate good for medicine? Is it normal medical practice to suppress data misconduct and 10 independent whistleblowers? It's only "getting there" when conditions to bypa…
Open the thread →
3 experts · 16 posts · 2d ago
Matches Concern & critique
“And if you set aside the market maximalism (and the other broad array of social and political harms), that should be a fine thing. It's not compatible with the way this is being sold as "the do eve…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Building & implementation · 2 Questions & unknowns · 1
austin: some thoughts - there’s a fucking cambrian explosion of software but it’s invisible because it’s personal. github isn’t getting hugged every other week for nothin’
austin: - the software you see on your phone and in the world is the product of organizations, and organizations move s l o w l y. developers are significantly more productive but it doesn’t matter if that…
Open the thread →
2 experts · 6 posts · 1d ago
Matches Concern & critique
“Please be a better critic. What's more likely? A magic chain of events over years results in a slop artist who doesn't do anything controlling the world's most powerful company and doing nothing, p…” evidence ↗
Phillip Carter: I mean, that's how almost everyone gets powerful or even mildly successful. The reality is that he _cofounded_ openai, and while not a researcher I think it's beyond silly to believe he doesn't do …
Phillip Carter: Mmmm, yes, a CEO who does nothing, with outside money that (magically) makes things that do nothing that nobody wants and yet it's arguably _the_ prevailing thing in our society right now? My broth…
Open the thread →