Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Concern & critique
0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

New & accelerating

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

New Vision & synthetic media Signal 12h ago

Scammers Are Using Docs’ Images, Voices in Deepfake Videos

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Scott McGrath
“Scammers are stealing doctors' faces and voices via deepfakes to sell supplements, often hitting millions of views. Takedown tools routinely fail or claim physicians lack standing. While the AMA backs the federal NO FAKES Act, doctors face serious liability…” evidence ↗
1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered
Scott McGrath

“Scammers are stealing doctors' faces and voices via deepfakes to sell supplements, often hitting millions of views. Takedown tools routinely fail or claim physicians lack standing. While the AMA backs the federal NO FAKES Act, doctors face serious liability…”

Primary source medscape.com ↗
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

3 experts · 5 posts · 1d ago
Emily M. Bender tante Louise Amoore
Matches Concern & critique
“Slapping an LLM In front of specialized machine learning systems that actually can solve specific tasks does not mean that the "stochastic parrot" metaphor has failed.” evidence ↗
Shared emphasis Concern & critique · 2
tante: Slapping an LLM In front of specialized machine learning systems that actually can solve specific tasks does not mean that the "stochastic parrot" metaphor has failed.
tante: What we do see is that you can use these models as "adapter" to the fuzzy real world (computer vision, language, etc) and potentially turn real world inputs into machine readable symbols that real …
Open the thread →