Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Context & explanation reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Context & explanation
0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

5 experts · 13 posts · 19h ago
Ted Underwood Andrew Perfors Andrew Piper Meredith Martin D. Hicks
Matches Context & explanation
“I'm not sure what happened; GenAI is part of it, but not all of it. The trend began earlier.” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Research & technical analysis · 1 Context & explanation · 1
Ted Underwood: We need a social movement to explain to students and entrepreneurs — that it's a bad idea to email random professors in other states for advice. It was charming to get one inquiry a month, but thre…
Ted Underwood: I'm not sure what happened; GenAI is part of it, but not all of it. The trend began earlier.
Open the thread →
5 experts · 6 posts · 1d ago
Margaret Mitchell Naomi Saphra Eugene Vinitsky Vilém Zouhar Luke Stark
Matches Context & explanation
“Also applies to people who don’t speak. See: history of “deaf and dumb” concept.” evidence ↗
Shared emphasis Context & explanation · 2
Naomi Saphra: Thinking LMs are sentient is the flip side of thinking nonhuman animals aren't sentient. We're so attuned to language as a signal for sentience that we can't conceive of unpairing sentience from li…
Luke Stark: Thinking LMs are sentient is the flip side of thinking nonhuman animals aren't sentient. We're so attuned to language as a signal for sentience that we can't conceive of unpairing sentience from li…
Open the thread →