Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources

Build my stream Create my edition

Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Who is contributing? How are they reacting?

Topic Search developments Clear all

Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Context & explanation reactions.

Context & explanation

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Context & explanation

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters

More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

5 experts · 39 posts · 1d ago

Ed Zitron SE Gyges Doll Nafnlaus 🇮🇸 🇺🇦 mackuba.eu

Matches Context & explanation

“i think most of us are in this context” evidence ↗

Multiple readings Policy & governance · 1 Opportunity & adoption · 1

SE Gyges: trying to deduce why one would quit a good job at anthropic

SE Gyges: what her boyfriend is up to today. they really do get around

Open the thread →

5 experts · 41 posts · 1d ago

Tim Kellogg Dustin Moskovitz jake coty.bsky.social david-p-reichert.bsky.social

Matches Context & explanation

“I guess... I have a hard time with anything above this scale. Like, p(90% of population dies) is hard enough, but at least we have historical evidence of our species going through that in the past.” evidence ↗

Reaction converging Concern & critique · 4 Questions & unknowns · 1

Tim Kellogg: perspective. i’m not sure if i agree or disagree. but he’s thought about it, so..

jake: yeah, and @david-p-reichert.bsky.social thinks about it more than I do, professionally, so probably listen to him more than I (I do still wish The Professionals published lists of various guestimat…

Open the thread →

2 experts · 5 posts · 1d ago

Dan Goodman Nafnlaus 🇮🇸 🇺🇦

Matches Context & explanation

“If you are interested in understanding what happened with AI hacking incidents, this is a much better article to read than all the breathless hype about AI "swarms" "going rogue".” evidence ↗

Dan Goodman: If you are interested in understanding what happened with AI hacking incidents, this is a much better article to read than all the breathless hype about AI "swarms" "going rogue".

Nafnlaus 🇮🇸 🇺🇦: Strong disagree (🧵) bsky.app/profile/nafn...

Open the thread →