Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Markets & investment reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Markets & investment
0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

6 experts · 37 posts · 15h ago
J. Nathan Matias Ronen Tamari Erin Kissane Luis Villa VE, cybersocial occult investigator 🇬🇾🗽Sydette The Dreaded Gorgon🗽🇬🇾
Matches Markets & investment
“(and because open communities chronically under-invest in recruitment and social organization in favor of technocentrism and the myth of scale, despite decades of evidence that the actual tech matt…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Building & implementation · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Erin Kissane: So am I just looking in the wrong places, or has the US left entirely whiffed building advocacy for [whatever we're calling competitive compatibility/adversarial interop now] in preparation for ret…
Luis Villa: @kissane.myatproto.social I have not seen anything; have not been specifically looking but does feel like it would have come across my radar. @tabularaza.net might have seen something?
Open the thread →
4 experts · 42 posts · 6h ago
Pwnallthethings Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真) Phillip Carter Doll
Matches Markets & investment
“I figured out the other ambiguity: buying surplus books when a bookstore goes out of business gets turned into "anthropic is buying out entire bookstores of their stock that was on shelves a moment…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Policy & governance · 1 Context & explanation · 1
Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真): literally these are books that would be pulped if not bought for 10 cents on the dollar. do rare books sometimes make it into there? yeah, if someone is careless, but that's *upstream* of what happ…
Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真): I literally worked on Google Books scanops SRE, ama the same guy who ran Google Books now has the equivalent job at Anthropic and I can promise you that all of us handled every library book with th…
Open the thread →
2 experts · 6 posts · 9h ago
Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真) Doll
Matches Markets & investment
“Fuck, you know where I bet this claim comes from? I bet they buy up insolvency stock from bookstores and that's why people claim the books they scan were on bookshelves. Technically true, but only …” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真): I also worked on Google Book search on the netsec side. Pulping books was for mass market books that you want to scan quickly & cheaply. Anthropic: doing the same thing. It's fine to disagree with …
Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真): People are conspiracy brain conflating checking out rare library books and scanning them, and destroying mass market books while scanning them. I've even seen assertions Anthropic buys up and destr…
Open the thread →