Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Questions & unknowns reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Questions & unknowns
0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Most important

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

New Policy & governance Signal 16h ago

Ai law discount billable hour

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Questions & unknowns reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Jeffrey Vagle
“I recently raised a version of this question with a panel of senior biglaw partners, and the answers ranged from shrugs to a blind trust that AI* tools will provide a magical solution. www.nytimes.com/2026/09/26/b...” evidence ↗
1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered
Jeffrey Vagle

“I recently raised a version of this question with a panel of senior biglaw partners, and the answers ranged from shrugs to a blind trust that AI* tools will provide a magical solution. www.nytimes.com/2026/09/26/b...”

Primary source nytimes.com ↗
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

7 experts · 30 posts · 8h ago
Eli Sennesh Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真) 🇬🇾🗽Sydette The Dreaded Gorgon🗽🇬🇾 Mary Branscombe Doll Amy Hoy Emily Hunt
Matches Questions & unknowns
“i haven’t and just poked around and found a 2021 blog post where she described it as sort of the ur-abusive tactic and “burn it with fire” but i’m guessing that’s not what you meant?” evidence ↗
Reaction converging Questions & unknowns · 3
Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真): "it's just an optional after hours event that just happens to have all of your colleagues in positions of power"
Doll: @tautologer.com Good on you btw for standing up to this
Open the thread →
2 experts · 21 posts · 16h ago
Singularity's Bounty e/cc Nafnlaus 🇮🇸 🇺🇦
Matches Questions & unknowns
“Even assuming that they have insurance against this (which is quite the assumption, one I am quite dubious of, to be honest), how long do you think insurance would keep covering them when zeros kee…” evidence ↗
Shared emphasis Research & technical analysis · 2
Nafnlaus 🇮🇸 🇺🇦: bsky.app/profile/nafn...
Nafnlaus 🇮🇸 🇺🇦: If you agree that the penalty under existing law is "a big check" and not "a prison sentence", then yes, we're in agreement. Not sure whether Will is or not.
Open the thread →
2 experts · 3 posts · 17h ago
Colin david-p-reichert.bsky.social
Matches Questions & unknowns
“Did openai actually use that language? (Genuine question) But yeah the analogies are breaking down at some point. Openai after all created the AI in the first place, so they're also responsible for…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Policy & governance · 1
david-p-reichert.bsky.social: Even legal personhood wouldn't necessarily absorb accountability. Companies can be responsible for what their human employees are doing, after all.
david-p-reichert.bsky.social: Did openai actually use that language? (Genuine question) But yeah the analogies are breaking down at some point. Openai after all created the AI in the first place, so they're also responsible for…
Open the thread →