Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Questions & unknowns reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Questions & unknowns
0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

New & accelerating

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

11 experts · 104 posts · 6h ago
Marc Lanctot Olivia Guest Sarah T Roberts, PhD Pwnallthethings Mike Caulfield Colin Adam Wiemerslage rev. howard arson
Matches Questions & unknowns
“So I’m not going to argue the point, but if they *exhibit* understanding of everything except parens, what don’t they understand? Can you copy paste elisp in and they will explain what it does? Hum…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Questions & unknowns · 3 Opportunity & adoption · 2 Concern & critique · 1
Sarah T Roberts, PhD: Try teaching college students. You won’t be quite so dismissive then.
Pwnallthethings: I think the "LLMs can't reason" stuff is mostly sophism these days. They plainly do not "reason" in the way humans do, and are certainly not always correct or good at it, but they are also doing th…
Open the thread →
2 experts · 14 posts · 1d ago
Tim Kellogg Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真)
Matches Questions & unknowns
“she is a linguist. who are YOU to question her lingualism?” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Opportunity & adoption · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真): They will use the full solution space that is available to them, and it is our responsibility to make sure that they don't act in unaligned ways. There is not really "choice" in something just repe…
Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真): We have to constrain the set of available choices, and that is on us. If we don't, and we just abdicate responsibility, we can't say "the machine did it"
Open the thread →