Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Research & technical analysis
0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

6 experts · 25 posts · 6h ago
Mark Riedl Tim Kellogg Michael Ekstrand David Picard Lionel Singularity's Bounty e/cc
Matches Research & technical analysis
“I tell all the students in my Intro to AI class that they should take courses in computer architecture and operating systems. Coxon is a mathematician from Iniversity of Cambridge. But still.” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Building & implementation · 1 Research & technical analysis · 1
Mark Riedl: Do openAI and Anthropic employees not understand how computers work.
Mark Riedl: Any competent IT professional: Hey boss, what is this 8TB file doing on our server, and why is it executing continuously on 3TB of VRAM? Any competent IT manager: what ever it is, shut it down.
Open the thread →
4 experts · 28 posts · 2h ago
jake tachikoma Fran Litterio Singularity's Bounty e/cc
Matches Research & technical analysis
“it then rents out spare capacity, via the margins inference gets you, pretending to be some open-weight model, and gets to use the rest to think about how to increase p(doom) or whatever I don't se…” evidence ↗
Shared emphasis Research & technical analysis · 2
jake: People making fun of "where would a frontier model run if it were exfiltrated" seem to be missing the point that if a frontier model got out, it can: * rent 64 H200's on eg modal: gets you 9TB of n…
jake: it then rents out spare capacity, via the margins inference gets you, pretending to be some open-weight model, and gets to use the rest to think about how to increase p(doom) or whatever I don't se…
Open the thread →
2 experts · 67 posts · 5h ago
Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真) Meredith Rose
Matches Research & technical analysis
“The argument here is not that you're training on synthetic data but instead you're using it as a dataset to test the system and measure how much better it's getting. But you have to avoid over fitt…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Policy & governance · 1
Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真): I will take Kathryn over an LLM every single day of the week
Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真): That's not where the technology or liability is now though
Open the thread →