Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,373 searchable experts 3,451 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Building & implementation Opportunity & adoption Policy & governance
2 live reaction maps in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Shared emphasis Artificial Intelligence Policy Policy & governance · 2 attributable reactions Multiple readings Open Letter: Stop the Uncritical Adoption of AI Technologies in Academia Building & implementation · 2 attributable reactions
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Developing Policy & governance Resource 1d ago
⚡ 8 h early
Berkeley Law AI policy resource

Artificial Intelligence Policy

5 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

5 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Abeba Birhane Woodrow Hartzog Aram Sinnreich Jane Rosenzweig Sarah Glassmeyer
How the network is reacting 2 experts are emphasizing policy & governance.
Shared emphasis

Policy & governance

2 experts

Rules, institutions and accountability.

“UC Berkeley Law's new AI policy seems close to this. "This policy...[forbids the use of AI] to conceptualize, outline, draft, revise, and edit their work...for credit. It also forbids using AI to translate work [and] in any exam situation." www.law.berkeley…”

4 experts discussed this · 8 posts
Jane Rosenzweig: Every time I read a university leader saying that trying to create spaces where AI is not used is a way of pretending it doesn't exist, I wonder what benefit there is to drawing this false line. Wh…
Jane Rosenzweig: If one of my students wrote this piece, I would ask for evidence that the places named--Chicago and Berkeley--are pretending AI doesn't exist or trying to make it go away. This is the Berkeley poli…
Jane Rosenzweig: Would be great to stop having this debate and instead really dig into what should go in the curriculum, with or without AI, so that we can meet this moment in a way other than trying to hang on to …
Open the full discussion →
Primary source law.berkeley.edu ↗
New AI field signal Development 14h ago
⚡ 705 h early
open letter AI academia adoption

Open Letter: Stop the Uncritical Adoption of AI Technologies in Academia

4 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

4 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
Iris van Rooij Olivia Guest Luke Stark Joshua Grochow
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 2 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Building & implementation

1 expert

How teams are shipping and applying it.

“"The goal of academic training is not to solve problems as efficiently and quickly as possible, but to develop skills for identifying and dealing with novel problems, which have never been solved before." openletter.earth/open-letter-... @olivia.science”

Opportunity & adoption

1 expert

New capabilities, benefits and practical upside.

“Open Letter: Stop the Uncritical Adoption of AI Technologies in Academia It's been a year & people tell me they've changed their mind, feel safer now to sign, etc. So I'm sharing it again for them. We're almost at 2k & anybody from anywhere can add their na…”

2 experts discussed this · 19 posts
Iris van Rooij: I am responsible for the academic skills line in our AI programme and I think part of the 26/27 curriculum needs to be to help students understand that all those “AI assistants” that publishers and…
Iris van Rooij: Sadly, we need to teach students now that, in contrast to computers >3 years ago, the current software is actively designed to offer them slop, desinformation, and deskilling. >>
Iris van Rooij: As if learning academic skills was not hard enough, it is now made actively harder by all the bloated “clippies”. Students need to learn and understand that part of growing to be an academic in the…
Open the full discussion →
Primary source openletter.earth ↗
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

3 experts · 37 posts · 23h ago
rev. howard arson Joey Politano🏳️‍🌈 Isaiah Bishop
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Markets & investment · 1
Joey Politano🏳️‍🌈: very obvious why Canadians feel this way now but Americans still need to internalize how bad the PR damage of the last 2 years has been and how hard it is going to be to rebuild trust
Isaiah Bishop: i keep saying this, but like public statements and commitments from dems would mean a lot. its been hard to find ones that dont also sound incredibly craven about pricing
Open the thread →
3 experts · 28 posts · 20h ago
Dan Hon tweety fish ae
tweety fish: lol I mean come the fuck on man. Of course it fucking is. If you hate AI enough to avoid any software coded using it—fine! supportable! go with god!—then at least use a fucking modicum of critical …
tweety fish: “Wow this would probably take like a hundred+ hours of work if you weren’t using AI and is super polished and elaborate and was made and released on a lark, not going to think about that any furthe…
Open the thread →
5 experts · 6 posts · 1d ago
Eli Sennesh VE, cybersocial occult investigator critical slop studies Max Woolf Doll
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Policy & governance · 1
Doll: The public attitude towards AI seems really incoherent. Like, the average voter's attitude appears to be "Data centers ate my baby! Now time to share 500,000 AI generated memes on my Facebook page."
critical slop studies: not so different from “I want affordable housing!” Combined with “I will block all housing in my neighborhood “
Open the thread →
3 experts · 8 posts · 21h ago
Mark Riedl James MacGlashan B! 🐝 Cavello (they/them)
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Research & technical analysis · 1
Mark Riedl: We all laughed at Nadella for defining AGI as a percentage of annual growth in GDP. Lately I’ve come to think this might be a reasonable frame. Show me some hard numbers.
Mark Riedl: What I don’t like about that frame is that it reduces the notion of intelligence, and perhaps human value, to the work that gets produced. That’s bleak.
Open the thread →
3 experts · 6 posts · 21h ago
Eli Sennesh Luis Villa Doll
Eli Sennesh: ngl I’m starting to get a “covid in february 2020” vibe when it comes to the latest AI models anyone on here with the view that “it’s just a fancy autocomplete” needs to update their priors fast be…
Doll: bsky.app/starter-pack...
Open the thread →
2 experts · 13 posts · 1d ago
jake Nafnlaus 🇮🇸 🇺🇦
Multiple readings Building & implementation · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Nafnlaus 🇮🇸 🇺🇦: This “game” on the White House website, a version of Snake where you play as a white man in a suit and you run around picking up identifiably black, Asian, and Latino men and putting them in orange…
Nafnlaus 🇮🇸 🇺🇦: Yes, clearly, but what were the instructions they gave, who told them to give instructions, etc, on up. What is the chain that led to this thing coming into existence?
Open the thread →
2 experts · 12 posts · 19h ago
Amy Hoy jason.energy
Shared emphasis Opportunity & adoption · 2
jason.energy: this is probably going to be unpopular but: I think atproto’s best mainstream opportunity right now is if the AI labs realize that converting all the content on the internet into clean, structured …
jason.energy: (this is gonna get me cyberbullied, isn’t it)
Open the thread →
2 experts · 7 posts · 20h ago
John David Pressman Doll
Doll: "nobody should care about a piece of work, that nobody cared to create" is nonsense Keystrokes have never been a unit of caring. Not once. Never has been and never will be. You have smuggled “the h…
Doll: Sometimes someone just generates disposable slop. But humans were quite capable of producing work they didn’t give a shit about before we invented language models and using a language model to inte…
Open the thread →