Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

New AI research Research 11h ago
⚡ 1275 h early
logical inference brains neural networks paper

On Logical Inference over Brains, Behaviour, and Artificial Neural Networks - Computational Brain & Behavior

4 experts are actively discussing the implications.

2 experts 1 community 1 sources clustered
Iris van Rooij Olivia Guest

“@andreaeyleen.eurosky.social and I address that actually in the cited 2023 paper: doi.org/10.1007/s421...”

4 experts discussed this · 254 posts
Olivia Guest: exactly 💯 on LLMs: they simulate the output we call language, not the cognitive capacity we call language!
Dr Keith Wilson 🏳️‍🌈: exactly 💯 on LLMs: they simulate the output we call language, not the cognitive capacity we call language!
Olivia Guest: You sound daft right now. Worry about that. Don't worry about me.
Open the full discussion →
Primary source link.springer.com ↗
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

3 experts · 5 posts · 1d ago
Clément Canonne David Picard A. Feder Cooper
Shared emphasis Research & technical analysis · 2
Clément Canonne: One solution: normalize desk-rejections. After a fast first assessment, papers are either desk-rejected, or go to full review. The current conf peer-review system has desk rejects as the exception,…
Clément Canonne: It does sting to get a desk rejection after one week. What else does? Waiting 4+ months for the same rejection, with a 2-line review (or, worse, an entirely AI-generated one). If you're not going t…
Open the thread →
3 experts · 4 posts · 1d ago
Emily M. Bender Alex Hanna Alix Dunn
Alex Hanna: We hit a huge milestone! 🎉 Mystery AI Hype Theater 3000 has reached half a million downloads, thanks to many of you. We started as an accidental podcast in May 2022. Now, 500k downloads and a lot o…
Emily M. Bender: We hit a huge milestone! 🎉 Mystery AI Hype Theater 3000 has reached half a million downloads, thanks to many of you. We started as an accidental podcast in May 2022. Now, 500k downloads and a lot o…
Open the thread →
2 experts · 8 posts · 1d ago
Dan Greene VE, cybersocial occult investigator
VE, cybersocial occult investigator: It’s the extension of Big Data logic - that b/c you consented to give data in one aspect at one point in time (social media) means you consented to all future sales, connections, applications of th…
VE, cybersocial occult investigator: They could also make a policy that it is a bannable offense if a user of the list is discovered having trained an agent or model on the emails in the list.
Open the thread →
2 experts · 6 posts · 1d ago
SwiftOnSecurity Doll
SwiftOnSecurity: I just used Claude to One-Shot a Windows Defender performance analyzer results analysis GUI and it's freaking incredible~. Holy carp. Oh my god. It has interactive timeline analysis and charts and …
SwiftOnSecurity: There is almost no amount of money my company wouldn't pay to equip me with with this capability. Dear lord this is incredible. It's turning my ideas for Defender diagnostics the last 8 years direc…
Open the thread →