Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,373 searchable experts 3,451 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Policy & governance
1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Shared emphasis Artificial Intelligence Policy Policy & governance · 2 attributable reactions
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Developing Policy & governance Resource 1d ago
⚡ 8 h early
Berkeley Law AI policy resource

Artificial Intelligence Policy

5 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

5 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Abeba Birhane Woodrow Hartzog Aram Sinnreich Jane Rosenzweig Sarah Glassmeyer
How the network is reacting 2 experts are emphasizing policy & governance.
Shared emphasis

Policy & governance

2 experts

Rules, institutions and accountability.

“UC Berkeley Law's new AI policy seems close to this. "This policy...[forbids the use of AI] to conceptualize, outline, draft, revise, and edit their work...for credit. It also forbids using AI to translate work [and] in any exam situation." www.law.berkeley…”

4 experts discussed this · 8 posts
Jane Rosenzweig: Every time I read a university leader saying that trying to create spaces where AI is not used is a way of pretending it doesn't exist, I wonder what benefit there is to drawing this false line. Wh…
Jane Rosenzweig: If one of my students wrote this piece, I would ask for evidence that the places named--Chicago and Berkeley--are pretending AI doesn't exist or trying to make it go away. This is the Berkeley poli…
Jane Rosenzweig: Would be great to stop having this debate and instead really dig into what should go in the curriculum, with or without AI, so that we can meet this moment in a way other than trying to hang on to …
Open the full discussion →
Primary source law.berkeley.edu ↗
Developing Policy & governance Resource 1d ago
Aspen Digital AI policy resource

Aspen Digital

2 experts are actively discussing the implications.

1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered
B! 🐝 Cavello (they/them)

“I still think the "race" framing is problematicccc, but I think there are cool ways to work with it www.aspendigital.org/report/strat...”

2 experts discussed this · 3 posts
brennan: this seems to be what I'm seeing (although I'm canadian, so maybe that itself is part of it) the hyperonline leftists are a bubble of anti-AI vitriol, but everyone I know socially (normie liberal t…
B! 🐝 Cavello (they/them): I still think the "race" framing is problematicccc, but I think there are cool ways to work with it www.aspendigital.org/report/strat...
B! 🐝 Cavello (they/them): I won't claim to be very steeped in leftism, but I think the retreat to copyright and property law is an interesting thing playing out over what I would consider an information commons. I think tha…
Open the full discussion →
Primary source aspendigital.org ↗
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

3 experts · 37 posts · 23h ago
rev. howard arson Joey Politano🏳️‍🌈 Isaiah Bishop
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Markets & investment · 1
Joey Politano🏳️‍🌈: very obvious why Canadians feel this way now but Americans still need to internalize how bad the PR damage of the last 2 years has been and how hard it is going to be to rebuild trust
Isaiah Bishop: i keep saying this, but like public statements and commitments from dems would mean a lot. its been hard to find ones that dont also sound incredibly craven about pricing
Open the thread →
4 experts · 13 posts · 22h ago
Eli Sennesh SE Gyges Andy Masley ae
Shared emphasis Concern & critique · 2
Andy Masley: If I avoid the word "alignment" and just ask "If we keep scaling AI models up, will we reliably avoid situations where they do something catastrophic pursuing a normal goal?" the answer seems like …
Andy Masley: , and I'm worried a lot of people really over-update on what we know about the safe behavior of current models or assume future models won't have a lot of the general "thinking" abilities normal hu…
Open the thread →
2 experts · 12 posts · 19h ago
Amy Hoy jason.energy
Shared emphasis Opportunity & adoption · 2
jason.energy: this is probably going to be unpopular but: I think atproto’s best mainstream opportunity right now is if the AI labs realize that converting all the content on the internet into clean, structured …
jason.energy: (this is gonna get me cyberbullied, isn’t it)
Open the thread →
2 experts · 8 posts · 1d ago
Ted Underwood Matthew Kirschenbaum
Matthew Kirschenbaum: The problem space we’re in is one in which neither any whiff of AI risks permanent reputational damage nor technocratic Dean wants to replace writing instruction with AI is a good or sustainable fu…
Matthew Kirschenbaum: The problem space is also one in which the debate is sufficiently polarized that the vast majority think either the one or the other is the correct position.
Open the thread →