404media.co via Hacker News

eBay Pulls AI Fake-Seed Seller After 37,271 Orders Sold

generative ai ai photo ai-business

TL;DR

  • One bogus rose seed seller racked up 37,271 sales on eBay before being banned, according to 404 Media.
  • A separate fake purple 'teddy bear sunflower' listing sold 1,301 times before being flagged on the same platform.
  • eBay cites compliance audits and AI monitoring; Amazon and Etsy did not respond to 404 Media's request for comment.

A simple scam wrapped in a new tool is doing brisk numbers on the biggest online marketplaces, and it's a useful tell for where generative AI is actually changing day-to-day commerce. According to reporting from 404 Media, sellers are using AI-generated images to peddle seeds for plants that do not exist: purple, gigantic 'teddy bear' sunflowers, rainbow-colored roses, butterfly-shaped flora, patriotic red, white and blue plants, and hostas that look like 'screaming demon shrimps.' One fake rose seed listing reportedly racked up 37,271 sales on eBay before being banned. A fake teddy bear sunflower listing moved 1,301 times.

The interesting part is not that the scam exists. Fake seed listings predate easy generative imagery. What's changed is the cost of producing a convincing-looking botanical fantasy: a few prompts and you have a hero shot that outperforms any honest catalog photo. The economics tilt sharply when the bait is cheap and the listings can stay up for years. A moderator of r/mycology told 404 Media that 'these listings have remained unchanged for years. It is a profitable business to sell fake seeds.'

The platforms answered unevenly. eBay told 404 Media that 'trust is foundational' to its marketplace and that it uses compliance audits and AI-supported monitoring to detect fraudulent activity. Amazon and Etsy did not respond. 404 Media also named one Etsy seller, Trenzay, whose listings use obviously AI-generated plant images and have been operating openly.

The honest caveat is that this is one outlet's reporting, and the sales counts come from individual listings rather than a full marketplace audit, so take the totals as illustrative of scale rather than a comprehensive measurement. What the reporting doesn't give you is how many of those 37,271 buyers received anything at all, versus nothing, versus viable but mislabeled seeds that could actually sprout something invasive.

What's worth watching is the arms race that follows. The same generative tools that make the bait cheap to produce also make detection cheaper at the platform level, and marketplaces that can credibly verify provenance, or at least flag AI-generated product imagery at upload, stand to win back the buyers being burned by every plausible-looking purple sunflower.

Shared on Bluesky by 2 AI experts