Who's Who of AI

arxiv cs.CL

81 trust feed @arxiv-cs-cl.bsky.social · 1,586 followers
Compute & infrastructure
Why they matter

Feed with public evidence across Compute & infrastructure.

AI signals
559
past 30d
Sources
2
distinct domains
Discusiones
0
past 30d
Latest signal
1d ago
View every signal from arxiv cs.CL →
Computer Science -- Computation and Language source: export.arxiv.org/rss/cs.CL maintainer: @tmaehara.bsky.social
What they're sharing

Articles & links

Teagan Johnson, Elliott Ash, Andrew Piper, Maria Antoniak Characterizing Narrative Content in Web-scale LLM Pretraining Data https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.19468

Characterizing Narrative Content in Web-scale LLM Pretraining Data arxiv.org
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • A new arXiv preprint introduces NarraBERT, a RoBERTa-based classifier, and applies it to 3 million passages from the 3-trillion-token Dolma corpus.
  • The framework operationalizes three narrative elements, agency, setting, and events, across 11 interpretable dimensions, trained on 400 annotated passages.
  • The authors report narrative qualities are unequally distributed across pretraining sources and topics in ways current curation practices do not measure.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky · ♥ 1 ↻ 0 ↩ 0 · 3 from the directory shared this · 39d ago

Maria Thomas, Kristina Gligoric, Nihar B. Shah Mitigating LLM-based p-Hacking by Preregistering for the Next LLM https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.27687

Mitigating LLM-based p-Hacking by Preregistering for the Next LLM arxiv.org
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • A new arXiv paper proposes preregistering LLM experiments and running the confirmatory analysis on the first eligible model released after registration.
  • Across 20 models from four providers and 11 configurations, the protocol blocked p-hack transfer in 73.9% and 72.7% of cases across two tasks.
  • The authors preregistered their own experiment; of 7 configurations that hacked the prior model, 6 failed to carry over to the next.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky · ♥ 0 ↻ 0 ↩ 0 · 3 from the directory shared this · 29d ago

Nina Begus World Wide Models: Literary Tools for Cultural AI https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.02369

[2607.02369] World Wide Models: Literary Tools for Cultural AI arxiv.org
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • Nina Begus argues LLMs stage a cultural encounter that is 'massive, automated, and monolingual,' and proposes literary scholarship as the corrective toolkit.
  • The essay proposes applying world literature methods — macrostructure, circulation, and untranslatability — to build culturally literate AI.
  • The 15-page essay is forthcoming in MFS Modern Fiction Studies in 2027 and connects critical theory to structural monolingualism in AI.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky · ♥ 0 ↻ 0 ↩ 0 · 3 from the directory shared this · 25d ago

Fitsum Reda, John Kamalu, Roger Waleffe, Mostofa Patwary, Mohammad Shoeybi, Bryan Catanzaro Nemotron-TwoTower: Diffusion Language Modeling with Pretrained Autoregressive Context https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.26493

Nemotron-TwoTower: Diffusion Language Modeling with Pretrained Autoregressive Context arxiv.org
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • NVIDIA's Nemotron-TwoTower splits an LM into a frozen autoregressive context tower and a trainable diffusion denoiser with bidirectional block attention.
  • The system is built on Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B, a 30B hybrid Mamba-Transformer MoE backbone, and trained on roughly 2.1 trillion tokens.
  • The authors report retaining 98.7% of the autoregressive baseline's quality while delivering 2.42x higher wall-clock generation throughput.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky · ♥ 0 ↻ 0 ↩ 0 · 3 from the directory shared this · 32d ago

Liancheng Gong, Zhiyang Wang, Yiwei Xu, Julia Mendelsohn Persuasion Index: A Theory-Guided Framework for Persuasion Analysis https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.14580

Persuasion Index: A Theory-Guided Framework for Persuasion Analysis arxiv.org
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • Persuasion Index is a taxonomy of 15 dimensions grounded in psychology and communication, implemented with 55 sub-features from lexicons and rule-based detectors.
  • The authors evaluate PI on four public datasets varying in domain, style, and outcome measures, and report linear models carry meaningful predictive signal while staying lightweight.
  • PI is released as an open-source package and web interface for principled and auditable analysis of human and AI-mediated communication.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky · ♥ 0 ↻ 0 ↩ 0 · 2 from the directory shared this · 43d ago

David Jurgens The Future of NLP may not be at NLP Conferences: Scholarly Migration Patterns in Natural Language Processing https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.02416

[2607.02416] The Future of NLP may not be at NLP Conferences: Scholarly Migration Patterns in Natural Language Processing arxiv.org
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • In the post-LLM era, established NLP authors lost 19.2pp of share at flagship *ACL main-conference tracks while gaining 14.8pp in Findings tracks.
  • General ML venues rose 8.6pp among established authors, even after adjusting for parallel growth across both fields.
  • Among debut authors with three or more first-author NLP papers, those mostly at *ACL fell from 84% in 2019 to 74% in 2024.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky · ♥ 0 ↻ 0 ↩ 0 · 2 from the directory shared this · 25d ago

Akshat Gupta, Jermaine Lei, Alexander Lu, Gopala Anumanchipalli, Leshem Choshen Automated Discovery Has No Universally Superior Harness https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.18235

Automated Discovery Has No Universally Superior Harness arxiv.org
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • Researchers tested 30 budget-matched harnesses across 12 model-problem pairs, running over 3.1 million LLM rollouts to compare autonomous discovery systems.
  • The paper's headline finding is that no fixed harness is reliably superior across the evaluated model-problem pairs, with OpenEvolve variants often underperforming simpler alternatives.
  • An adaptive-allocation approach that prunes weak harnesses mid-run and reallocates budget to stronger candidates beat both fixed-harness commitment and non-adaptive ensembles.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky · ♥ 0 ↻ 0 ↩ 0 · 2 from the directory shared this · 7d ago

Joseph Marvin Imperial, Junhong Liang, Belal Shoer, Abdullah Barayan, Rodrigo Wilkens, Omar Mussa, Dawn Knight, Eug\'enio Ribeiro, Ekaterina Kochmar, ... ComplexityMT: Benchmarking the Interaction Between Text Complexity and Machine Translation https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.05421

ComplexityMT: Benchmarking the Interaction Between Text Complexity and Machine Translation arxiv.org
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • ComplexityMT benchmarks machine translation across Arabic, Dutch, English, French, Hindi and Russian using CEFR as the measure of text complexity.
  • Higher CEFR levels make texts more difficult to translate, and MT systems shift the CEFR level of the target versus the source for most languages.
  • The study evaluates three open-weight models, one closed model and one commercial machine translation system on two CEFR-grounded tasks.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky · ♥ 0 ↻ 0 ↩ 1 · 2 from the directory shared this · 53d ago

Xinyu Geng, Xuanhua He, Sixiang Chen, Yanjing Xiao, Fan Zhang, Shijue Huang, Haitao Mi, Zhenwen Liang, Tianqing Fang, Yi R. Fung DeepSearch-World: Self-Distillation for Deep Search Agents in a Verifiable Environment https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.07820

DeepSearch-World: Self-Distillation for Deep Search Agents in a Verifiable Environment arxiv.org
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • A 9B-parameter web agent reaches 31.2% on BrowseComp, 61.5% on GAIA, and 93.4% on HotpotQA using self-distillation.
  • The DeepSearch-World environment supplies 420,000 multi-hop QA tasks built from entity-level random walks with reproducible search and page-reading.
  • The training loop cycles through trajectory generation, filtering, data mixing, and fine-tuning without relying on a larger teacher model.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky · ♥ 0 ↻ 0 ↩ 0 · 2 from the directory shared this · 18d ago
Their network

In arxiv cs.CL's orbit

Center = arxiv cs.CL. Left = members they follow (green edges). Right = members who follow them (blue edges). Top = mutual follows (orange edges, slightly larger). Drag any node to reposition; click to open that profile.