arxiv cs.CL

Why they matter

Feed with public evidence across Compute & infrastructure.

AI signals
450
past 30d
Sources
1
distinct domains
Discussions
0
past 30d
Latest signal
6h ago
View every signal from arxiv cs.CL →
Computer Science -- Computation and Language source: export.arxiv.org/rss/cs.CL maintainer: @tmaehara.bsky.social

Articles & links

Thomas Hikaru Clark, Matias B. Martin, Kyle Mahowald Why is AI-generated language so hard to understand? https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29162

Why is AI-generated language so hard to understand? arxiv.org
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • All nine frontier and near-frontier models tested used more inanimate subjects with animate verbs and more low-frequency n-grams than human writing.
  • The authors argue training pressure toward math, code, and reasoning favors information density over the communication efficiency human language evolved for.
  • Fine-tuning a language model under a length penalty reproduced the divergence from human-like linguistic behavior, serving as the paper's proof-of-concept.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky · ♥ 12 ↻ 2 ↩ 0 · 7 from the directory shared this · 13d ago

Glenn Matlin, Chandreyi Chakraborty, Saehee Eom, Mika Okamoto, Rayan Castilla, Louis Jaburi, Alvin Deng, Taywon Min, Lucia Quirke, Stella Biderman, Mark Riedl Where Does Social Reasoning Come From? Capability Provenance in Language Models https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.19625

Where Does Social Reasoning Come From? Capability Provenance in Language Models arxiv.org
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • OLMo3-7B's social and STEM reasoning trace to 'qualitatively distinct corpus regions' of its Dolma3 pretraining mix, per gradient-based training-data attribution.
  • The social-STEM split is sharper at the reasoning level (SocialIQA, ARC-Challenge) than at the knowledge level (MMLU Social Sciences, MMLU STEM).
  • Unlearning high-attribution topics like Literature degraded SocialIQA more than within-topic random baselines, giving what the authors call 'partial causal validation.'
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky · ♥ 0 ↻ 0 ↩ 0 · 3 from the directory shared this · 140d ago

DiffusionGemma Team, Adrien Ali Ta\"iga, James Assiene, Daniele Calandriello, Rahma Chaabouni, Jo\~ao Gante, Tamara von Glehn, Nate Keating, Chris Knutsen, Martin Kukla, Tianlin Liu, Ivan Lobov, Ofir Nabati, ... DiffusionGemma Technical Report https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.00146

DiffusionGemma Technical Report arxiv.org
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • DiffusionGemma reportedly generates around 1,500 output tokens per second on a single NVIDIA H100 by refining blocks of 256 tokens in parallel.
  • The model is a fine-tune of the mixture-of-experts Gemma 4 base, which has 3.8B activated and 25.2B total parameters.
  • Its two-stage training pipeline of supervised denoising plus RL with sampler distillation used less than 10% of the original AR model's token budget.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky · ♥ 1 ↻ 1 ↩ 0 · 4 from the directory shared this · 93d ago

Teagan Johnson, Elliott Ash, Andrew Piper, Maria Antoniak Characterizing Narrative Content in Web-scale LLM Pretraining Data https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.19468

Characterizing Narrative Content in Web-scale LLM Pretraining Data arxiv.org
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • A new arXiv preprint introduces NarraBERT, a RoBERTa-based classifier, and applies it to 3 million passages from the 3-trillion-token Dolma corpus.
  • The framework operationalizes three narrative elements, agency, setting, and events, across 11 interpretable dimensions, trained on 400 annotated passages.
  • The authors report narrative qualities are unequally distributed across pretraining sources and topics in ways current curation practices do not measure.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky · ♥ 1 ↻ 0 ↩ 0 · 3 from the directory shared this · 140d ago

Katherine Van Koevering, Anjalie Field It's How You Ask: Gender-Associated Linguistic Bias in LLMs https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13328

It's How You Ask: Gender-Associated Linguistic Bias in LLMs arxiv.org
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • Prompts using hedges, tag questions, and collective reference drew shorter, less sophisticated, less formal LLM replies across three document types and four models.
  • Linguistic register outweighed explicit cues like sign-off names in shaping response quality, according to the paper's representational analysis.
  • The authors report the effect is encoded in early transformer layers and entangled with other features, making post-hoc mitigation difficult.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky · ♥ 0 ↻ 0 ↩ 0 · 3 from the directory shared this · 84d ago

Fanfei Li, Jana Zeller, Manuel Prada-Corral, Thadd\"aus Wiedemer, Prasanna Mayilvahanan, Ryan Cotterell, Wieland Brendel LittleLearner: Language Models Under Pedagogically Controlled Knowledge Exposure https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13545

LittleLearner: Language Models Under Pedagogically Controlled Knowledge Exposure arxiv.org
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • LITTLECURRICULUM is an 88-billion-token pretraining corpus curated to U.S. elementary school material through Grade 5.
  • A 5-billion-parameter model trained from scratch on that corpus, LITTLELEARNER, has knowledge boundaries mapped to interpretable curriculum guidelines.
  • Post-training and in-context learning helped the model use existing knowledge but did not raise out-of-scope capabilities.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky · ♥ 0 ↻ 0 ↩ 0 · 3 from the directory shared this · 84d ago

Jenna Russell, Ben Glickenhaus, Katherine Thai, John Wieting, Mohit Iyyer, Max Spero, Bradley Emi How Much Is an AI Token Worth? Scaling Laws for Wild AI-Generated Web Text https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.40295

How Much Is an AI Token Worth? Scaling Laws for Wild AI-Generated Web Text arxiv.org
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • Pangram labeled 27.5% of June 2026 web tokens as AI-generated, rising to 31.1% by August, after FineWeb quality filtering.
  • For high-human-budget runs AI tokens raise loss almost immediately; data-starved runs see an early benefit that saturates and reverses.
  • The authors' new scaling law predicts effects on models up to 3.6x larger with 41% lower error than existing laws across all AI ratios.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky · ♥ 3 ↻ 1 ↩ 0 · 3 from the directory shared this · 36d ago

Vil\'em Zouhar, Niyati Bafna, Mukund Choudhary, Maike Z\"ufle, Sara Rajaee, Pinzhen Chen, Jannis Vamvas, Sara Papi, Ona de Gibert, Bhavitvya Malik, Eliya Habba, Orfeas Menis Mastromichalakis, Patr\'icia Schmidtov\'a, ... Last Translation Benchmark https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.04173

Last Translation Benchmark arxiv.org
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • Last Translation Benchmark ships peer-reviewed hard examples, each paired with handcrafted verification rules that flag concrete failure cases instead of assigning a metric score.
  • LTBv1 covers submissions accepted before September 1st 2026, spans texts, images, audio and videos, and is designed to accept ongoing contributions.
  • The authors argue MT is stuck: standard benchmarks are saturating, automatic metrics are gameable, and human evaluation lacks reproducibility and scalability.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky · ♥ 1 ↻ 0 ↩ 0 · 3 from the directory shared this · 63d ago

Zeyu Zhang, Ziliang Guo, Yihang Sun, Xichong Zhang, Xixuan Hao, Zehao Lin, Yang Zhang, Xiaoyan Zhao, Tong Shen, Bo Tang, Zhi-Qin John Xu, Junchi Yan, Haofen Wang, Xu Chen, Feiyu Xiong, Zhiyu Li, Tat-Seng Chua Metis: Memory Foundation Model https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.26760

Metis: Memory Foundation Model arxiv.org
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • Metis introduces a persistent, dynamically evolving memory state built into the model backbone rather than as an external retrieval module.
  • The authors train Metis at 4B, 9B, and 27B parameters on a Qwen3.5 backbone using 8 H100 GPUs and around 406M synthesized tokens.
  • Metis-27B reports 73.77% average on the paper's constructed test set versus 1.69% for the baseline Qwen3.5-27B without context.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky · ♥ 0 ↻ 0 ↩ 0 · 3 from the directory shared this · 99d ago

Maria Thomas, Kristina Gligoric, Nihar B. Shah Mitigating LLM-based p-Hacking by Preregistering for the Next LLM https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.27687

Mitigating LLM-based p-Hacking by Preregistering for the Next LLM arxiv.org
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • A new arXiv paper proposes preregistering LLM experiments and running the confirmatory analysis on the first eligible model released after registration.
  • Across 20 models from four providers and 11 configurations, the protocol blocked p-hack transfer in 73.9% and 72.7% of cases across two tasks.
  • The authors preregistered their own experiment; of 7 configurations that hacked the prior model, 6 failed to carry over to the next.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky · ♥ 0 ↻ 0 ↩ 0 · 3 from the directory shared this · 129d ago

In arxiv cs.CL's orbit

Center = arxiv cs.CL. Left = members they follow (green edges). Right = members who follow them (blue edges). Top = mutual follows (orange edges, slightly larger). Drag any node to reposition; click to open that profile.

Are you arxiv cs.CL? Show it.

Add the Who’s Who of AI badge to your site or bio. It links back to this profile.

Listed in AI Weekly's Who's Who of AI

Markdown: [![Listed in AI Weekly's Who's Who of AI](https://aiweekly.co/modules/custom/aiweekly_whoswho/images/whoswho-badge.svg)](https://aiweekly.co/whos-who/person/arxiv-cs-cl-bsky-social)