Join free with your email
Free. No spam, ever — we'll never share your email address and you can opt out at any time. ¿Ya tienes cuenta? Inicia sesión
Researcher with public evidence across AI research, Policy & governance.
"we have put them in a situation that makes them vulnerable to their desire for speed and to their anxiety about looking stupid; we risk becoming the unwitting thieves of our children’s intellectual clarity" #AIslop www.theguardian.com/books/ng-int...
Huh. And Anthropic also failed to airgap. Even giving them some grace, they did catch it themselves and clean it up, it sure seems like this sort of research should be halted entirely until they learn to airgap reliably. With legal consequences for not doing that. www.anthropi…
Calling #AIs “stochastic parrots” is a common yet misapplied turn of phrase these days. One of the authors of the original paper that used the phrase, Dr. Bender, clarifies what the authors really meant and some larger misconceptions about AI and natural language. spectrum.iee…
'Last year Meta sold 7m pairs of the glasses, which cost between £269 and £469. Fears about Meta glasses being used to film people, especially women, without their consent has led to them being labelled “pervert glasses” www.theguardian.com/technology/2...
Here's this week's Better Offline monologue. 70% or more of hyperscaler AI revenues are from Anthropic and OpenAI's compute spend and revenue shares. Without two unsustainable AI labs, the era of hypergrowth is coming to an end. podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/m... linktr.ee/bet…
just like they did when they stole TikTok, they're going to use xenophobia and a fake concern for national security to undermine on-device open source AI alternatives to protect the biggest companies' expensive walled garden AI empires
Late Friday, the Commerce Department eased its block on Anthropic's Mythos. But UC Berkeley Risk and Security Lab's Andrew W. Reddie argues Lutnick's letter leaves the hard question unanswered. www.techpolicy.press/commerce-eas...
Many read Xi's call to "encourage open source" AI as China going all-in on open weights. Graham Webster, a Stanford scholar and DigiChina editor-in-chief, argues the same speech stressed "security and controllability" — signaling an unresolved tension, not a settled bet.
"AI is better understood through past history & current engagement with its actual consequences for contemporary human society than guesses about how it might work magic. More grounded approaches to AI keep on getting dragged back into irresolvable fights"about AGI knightcolum…
Here's this week's Better Offline monologue. 70% or more of hyperscaler AI revenues are from Anthropic and OpenAI's compute spend and revenue shares. Without two unsustainable AI labs, the era of hypergrowth is coming to an end. podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/m... linktr.ee/bet…
This interview with Simon Johnson, chair of the new UK AI Economics Institute, is interesting not so much because it is very revelatory but because his views will presumably shape policy and ministerial opinions giftarticle.ft.com/giftarticle/...
Dublin; 2023 #datacentres (used 20%) of Ireland’s electricity. “This is a planetary thing. We have to have some courage to show up, it’s difficult when you’re up against forces that have all the money and all the intelligence and all the bandwidth in the world.” www.theguardia…
Center = Chris Marsden. Left = members they follow (green edges). Right = members who follow them (blue edges). Top = mutual follows (orange edges, slightly larger). Drag any node to reposition; click to open that profile.
Add the Who’s Who of AI badge to your site or bio. It links back to this profile.
Markdown: [](https://aiweekly.co/whos-who/person/chrismarsden-bsky-social)