Cero spam. Nunca compartiremos tu correo y puedes darte de baja cuando quieras. ¿Ya tienes cuenta? Inicia sesión
We love basically everything about @cyberlyra.bsky.social @zephoria.bsky.social @alex-taylor.bsky.social @bshestakofsky.bsky.social manifesto arxiv.org/abs/2604.16106 - with 1 exception. Several JCE authors have been working on this stuff for a while. It’s a whole field not ju…
So this is interesting -- there's a website where you can check whether you're in the weights of the various LLMs. Note "MODELS MAY HALLUCINATE BIOGRAPHICAL DETAILS OR EVENTS THAT NEVER HAPPENED" intheweights.com
Thank god, someone has noticed that "AI content" is generated by AI providers, duh 😂 say hello, DSA. Also consistent with ancient German autocomplete case law , remember Bettina Wulff? www.spiegel.de/internationa...
A neat trick to test LLM's 'reasoning' is to present a well-known dilemma or riddle, but add a small perturbation which removes the source of contradiction. A few years back I had fun trying out famous thought experiments from ethics like the Trolley Problem and Organ Harvest …
Missing cat Man with van Bassist wanted AI math fight, £100 prize
I'm seeing this line that you shouldn't worry about AI taking your job, because we'll just sell more stuff cheaper (Jevons' paradox). But this assumes induced demand, which in turn assumes an economy where people have enough disposable income left to buy your stuff if only it was a bit cheaper
Center = Reuben Binns. Left = members they follow (green edges). Right = members who follow them (blue edges). Top = mutual follows (orange edges, slightly larger). Drag any node to reposition; click to open that profile.