Join free with your email
Free. No spam, ever — we'll never share your email address and you can opt out at any time. Já tem conta? Entre
Researcher with public evidence across AI business, AI research.
from the Editor in Chief of Science: "Rigorous human checking of AI-generated research papers is creating bottlenecks as publishers strive to maintain the integrity of the scientific record. The challenge is requiring even more human effort, making the whole endeavor slower an…
Not missing but relevant is the power of models to shift your attitude in interactions beyond messaging or chat. As we showed in this work, even AI autocomplete suggestions can shift people's attitudes on important societal topics, often without their awareness: www.science.or…
Zuckerberg wants AI to optimize and empower each of us as individuals, but society isn't billions of individuals. We depend on each other as a collective, @petterbb1969.bsky.social writes. AI individualism is not good for society. www.techpolicy.press/no-zuckerber...
Very recent (2 weeks ago!) research seems to support my experience: Agents don't stick to the plan, especially as the context window fills up with junk, which seems to me like an inevitably byproduct of producing language until the words independently arrive at a conclusion. a…
I wrote about a reason not to use generative AI in your writing that I haven't seen anyone talking about. Once I realized this, banning GenAI in our lab's writing became a no-brainer. Feel free to share, I think this is probably useful especially for trainees: www.carlsonlab.b…
Here's John Gallagher on orbital argumentation: meresophistry.substack.com/p/seeking-hu...
Do you know of studies that actually evaluate use of LLMs in the public sector or other kinds of knowledge work? Teknologirådet in Norway just published a report evaluating their own use of LLMs, based on careful logs from 35 cases. teknologiradet.no/publication/...
Angus Fletcher argued that LLMs can’t do narrative because they only do correlation, not causation. muse.jhu.edu/article/778252
But you can't remove the awful AI tells, strict rules don't work. Code is here: github.com/jhave/narrac...
"This week @jilltxt.bsky.social, Co-director of the Center for Digital Narrative at the University of Bergen, declared 'shimmer' the newest AI word to make your eye twitch," writes #IBM: www.ibm.com/think/news/a...
Two new talks on how LLMs affect writing are up on the @cdn-bergen.bsky.social YouTube channel, both from the AI STORIES event last week - you can access them from the event webpage here www4.uib.no/en/research/...
The AI-generated podcast paper is out! I generaetd podcasts from four different source documents and an PDF using NotebookLM and found that in every case it translated cultural contexts to a standard, white, American language and context. journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
80% of the articles published in AI & Society seem to be AI slop these days. I want to find the good articles but I hate wading through the slop.
My article on AI-generated podcasts already has three citations and at least one is AI-generated. Look at this fine example of an ultra-vague statement with a drive-by citation that doesn't match the claim. The entire article is 100% AI-generated according to Pangram.
Trying to update my ID for a bank but there's an issue, so I asked the chatbot about it & it bizarrely thought I was suicidal. It's great that chatbots designers try to help people who are struggling emotionally, but wow, my banking question was parsed as emotional distress. I wish they had humans.
Center = Jill Walker Rettberg. Left = members they follow (green edges). Right = members who follow them (blue edges). Top = mutual follows (orange edges, slightly larger). Drag any node to reposition; click to open that profile.
Add the Who’s Who of AI badge to your site or bio. It links back to this profile.
Markdown: [](https://aiweekly.co/whos-who/person/jilltxt-bsky-social)