No spam, ever. We'll never share your email address and you can opt out at any time. Already a subscriber? Log in
I wrote a very short piece on models & modelling in part because we need to protect our scientific praxis damage caused by AI in terms of addictive frictionless thinking, esp since it harms society broadly too. "Models" doi.org/10.5281/zeno... Thanks @carvalhais.org for inviti…
Shut up you absolute clowns be ashamed you absolute dingbats with your "always smoke with a filter" > Removing “please”, “thank you” and other unnecessary words from AI prompts could save 87 to 98 gigawatt-hours of electricity per year, the report from the UN Unhinged and sham…
> AI centrists assume that splitting the difference between exalting AI and rejecting it means accepting the technology—because, as their reasoning often goes, “AI is here to stay.” [And] concerns about AI’s potential harms are supposedly satisfied by a vague commitment to “re…
For me, the most telling thing about this interaction is the 'business journalists' difficulty acknowledging basic facts of cost benefit, unit economics and ROI when applied to 'AI' - youtu.be/zbKDmkJPVvI?...
I propose that we needn't wait for hypothetical, future uses but reject LLMs and resurrect algorithmically performed statistical analysis here and now as I argue here: www.linkedin.com/pulse/ai-rea...
Center = Dwayne Monroe. Left = members they follow (green edges). Right = members who follow them (blue edges). Top = mutual follows (orange edges, slightly larger). Drag any node to reposition; click to open that profile.
