Damien Williams

Assistant professor of philosophy and data science

Read threads Assistant Prof Philosophy & Data Science PhD Science, Technology, & Society MA Philosophy & Religious Studies "AI" Criticality; Centering Marginalized Lived Experiences in Tech; Magic; Human Knowledge, Values, Culture, & Beliefs He/Him/His

Articles & links

This nature survey on "AI" attitudes is a pretty blunt instrument. Seven questions, two of which are demographic, and none of which get granular about what they mean by either "AI" or "use." We need to have been doing better than this, and we're really going to need to start, …

Do you hate or love AI? Take Nature’s poll nature.com
View on Bluesky · ♥ 84 ↻ 15 ↩ 4 · 2 from the directory shared this · 11d ago
Damien Williams reposted
Iris van Rooij @irisvanrooij.bsky.social

"Fake citations have turned into a nightmare for research librarians, who by some estimates are wasting up to 15 percent of their work hours responding to requests for nonexistent records that ChatGPT or Google Gemini alluded to." open access link: archive.ph/qt59c 2/🧵

archive.ph View on Bluesky →
Damien Williams reposted
@thefarce.org

How AI Plans to Buy 2026 This election should be a slam dunk for Democrats. There are billions of reasons it absolutely is not. I'm going Paul Revere on this one and connecting the dots. One thing you can never say is that you haven't been told.

thefarce.org View on Bluesky →

I said it before & I'll say it again: Any company trying to integrate "generative AI" into their workflow needs someone w/ veto power whose sole job it is to ask "…Okay, but can you prove it actually *does* [thing company wants to apply it for]?" & to Keep asking until they ge…

wbng.org
View on Bluesky · ♥ 186 ↻ 49 ↩ 8 · 3 from the directory shared this · 5d ago
Damien Williams reposted
Hypervisible @hypervisible.blacksky.app

“Starbucks aimed to use the app to help solve product shortages but found that it confused product names or missed items altogether when performing inventory counts.”

pymnts.com View on Bluesky →

I mean, there are plenty of people who know how to do a good survey, but a lot of have institutional constraints. In the broader research sphere, @pewresearch.org's work is pretty much gold-standard; here's some of their work on "AI" attitudes and impacts: 1) www.pewresearch.o…

pewresearch.org
View on Bluesky · ♥ 1 ↻ 0 ↩ 0 · 10d ago

There's too many good used bookstores, my local small shop is Great, and bookshop dot org exists. Fuck b&n if it comes to it.

the-independent.com
AI Weekly's analysis
  • Barnes & Noble will stock AI-written books if labeled transparently and free of copyright infringement, per CEO James Daunt.
  • Daunt admitted the existing 300,000-title catalog may already contain AI-generated books the retailer cannot identify.
  • Author backlash has reframed the debate around whether major retailers have a curation duty beyond disclosure requirements.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky · ♥ 64 ↻ 16 ↩ 3 · 9d ago

Scholars are Failing the GPT Review Process (2024) online.ucpress.edu/hsns/article... bsky.app/profile/wolv...

online.ucpress.edu
View on Bluesky · ♥ 4 ↻ 0 ↩ 1 · 11d ago

Recent commentary

Two commencement speakers loudly & persistently booed for praising this current paradigm of "AI," most recently being Eric damn Schmidt, & he also looked fully stunned; which, y'know what? Good. Seems the only way these people are gonna learn is by facing a very large crowd clearly telling them "No"

View on Bluesky · ♥ 756 ↻ 125 ↩ 14 · 11d ago

Just scrolled by an anti-AI story from the Washington fucking Times so i'm really going to need Democrats to get on-message and start claiming that "AI==higher cost of living + lower quality of life + billionaire greed + consent violation" space, really fucking fast. Fucking MOVE.

View on Bluesky · ♥ 628 ↻ 153 ↩ 12 · 14d ago

They removed the ability to google "disregard" because it breaks their "AI," but "Ignore" still returns this:

View on Bluesky · ♥ 257 ↻ 39 ↩ 14 · 7d ago

I think my 2 most pertinent/prescient pieces in the last few years were "Scholars are Failing the GPT Review Process" (2024) & "Reimagining 'AI's Environmental & Sociotechnical Materialities" (2025). In the 1st i talk about the pressures & harms likely to spur a huge increaase in acdemic "AI" slop…

View on Bluesky · ♥ 58 ↻ 19 ↩ 2 · 11d ago

Reminder that you Can just cite lectures: Williams, D.P., 2023, October. On Bullshit Engines: The Socioethical & Epistemic Status of GPTs & other ‘AI.’ In Forum in Ethics, Law, & Society Lecture Series, hosted by the Sonoma State University Philosophy Department’s Center for Ethics, Law & Society.

View on Bluesky · ♥ 67 ↻ 12 ↩ 3 · 10d ago