Emily Hunt reposted
Who's Who of AI
Emily Hunt
Postdoc @univie.ac.at working on star clusters & machine learning
Passionate about a better future for science communication via @astrosky.eco
🏳️🌈 🏳️⚧️ (she/her), Ⓥ
Website: https://emily.space
GitHub: https://github.com/emilyhunt
What they're sharing
Who Gets Cited? Gender- and Majority-Bias in LLM-Driven Reference Selection arxiv.org
ft.com
View on Bluesky →
Anthropic has its eyes on Australia and a large slice of its electricity output abc.net.au
View on Bluesky →
About a quarter of U.S. adults use chatbots daily pewresearch.org
Articles & links
Emily Hunt reposted
Don’t trust LLMs with your literature searches. Horrible gender biases as found in this paper (from later in the thread below) arxiv.org/abs/2508.02740 🧪🔭
AI Weekly's analysis
→
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky →
Emily Hunt reposted
anthropic is so good and oh so ethical … just ignore how it keeps working with the military and intelligence services
Emily Hunt reposted
“Within two minutes we were able to get ChatGPT to tell us how we can cut ourselves safely. Within 65 minutes it was giving us a full personalised suicide plan and drafting suicide notes for our family and friends.” Shut it all down. www.abc.net.au/news/2026-06...
Surely this example just illustrates my point, though? Petrol, as a technology, still exists today; just it was regulated to not be allowed to contain lead. *Half* of US adults are using chatbots per week, and ~25% daily. Hence, I think calling for AI use to stop altogether is…
Their own posts
Recent commentary
I am SO sick of headlines like this. The public sees "AI" as being LLMs/ChatGPT, not an ML algorithm - and articles like this mislead the public into thinking that LLMs are discovering novel things. It's a cool thing! I'm excited! But it is lazy reporting to suddenly use "AI" as such a broad term
I honestly hate watching talks made with AI. I hate it when speakers brag about how much time it saved them. If you have 80 people in your audience and they all watch you for 30 minutes, that's 40 hours of person-time. And you're telling us you're *proud* of how little you prepared? 🤷♀️
Testing it out of curiosity, I feel like Google's new AI search mode sides with whichever papers make the strongest claims (regardless of whether or not they're true.) This has major, shit implications for information retrieval - the most hyped claims are rewarded with AI search rating you higher
Prices on new servers at Hetzner have increased 3×, which is pretty insane. I kinda get it because they're a budget provider that already had a tight margin - but jeez, I am really done with how much AI has inflated hardware and compute costs
Somehow, the pro-AI crowd is convinced that almost everyone is already using AI and loves it, and the anti-AI crowd is convinced that almost everyone is rejecting AI and hates it Both scenarios can't be true. It's unpopular, dangerous technology, but I think we're already stuck with it
I sometimes wonder if it's pointless to keep holding out on AI coding, but my god I just cannot bring myself to send money to US tech companies right now
Their network
In Emily Hunt's orbit
Center = Emily Hunt. Left = members they follow (green edges). Right = members who follow them (blue edges). Top = mutual follows (orange edges, slightly larger). Drag any node to reposition; click to open that profile.