This article makes two important points: 1. People using ChatGPT expose sensitive data because they think it is private 2. OpenAI relies on hundreds of human contractors reviewing replies to improve their models www.404media.co/inside-proje...
Inside ‘Project Lily’: The Humans Reading Your ChatGPT Chats 404media.co
AI Weekly's analysis
→
- OpenAI's internal program codenamed Project Lily pays contractors more than $50 an hour to read real ChatGPT prompts and grade the chatbot's replies.
- Reviewers rate four ChatGPT responses on a one-to-seven scale and can see a 'user memories summary' that may reveal past use and rough location.
- OpenAI's Privacy Filter model tries to redact personal information before prompts reach reviewers, but the company acknowledged sensitive details can still get through.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky ·
♥ 185
↻ 74
↩ 6
·
17 from the directory shared this ·
12d ago
Now is a good time to remember that Meta has announced that it is laying off 10% of its workforce, including 2,000 people just today, while going in on a "AI will replace workers" strategy. www.404media.co/hackers-simp...
Hackers Simply Asked Meta AI to Give Them Access to High-Profile Instagram Accounts. It Worked 404media.co
View on Bluesky ·
♥ 491
↻ 219
↩ 15
·
15 from the directory shared this ·
117d ago
The Meta Ray-Ban creep glasses already have facial-recognition capabilities--Meta just hasn't enabled them yet. www.wired.com/story/meta-s...
Meta Silently Added Face-Recognition Code for Its Smart Glasses to Millions of Phones wired.com
View on Bluesky ·
♥ 95
↻ 51
↩ 5
·
13 from the directory shared this ·
114d ago
As a person whose name and likeness regularly gets used for AI slop, @kashhill.bsky.social's AI-written biography has unlocked an entirely new kind of nightmare fuel: www.nytimes.com/2026/07/16/t...
nytimes.com
View on Bluesky ·
♥ 70
↻ 14
↩ 1
·
11 from the directory shared this ·
72d ago
↻
evacide reposted
"Once again, a core feature of a major piece of AI technology will actually just be people working in a call center." www.404media.co/meta-tests-m...
Meta Tests Muse AI Agent Calls That Are Actually Made By Humans in a Call Center 404media.co
AI Weekly's analysis
→
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky ·
♥ 85
↻ 35
↩ 5
·
8 from the directory shared this ·
3d ago
When I do a web search, I do not want Google to go to the websites for me, pull the information, and interpret it for me. I want it to give me a list of websites that I can read and evaluate myself because AI is frequently wrong: techcrunch.com/2026/05/19/g...
Google Search as you know it is over | TechCrunch techcrunch.com
View on Bluesky ·
♥ 473
↻ 118
↩ 25
·
9 from the directory shared this ·
130d ago
Today in Pervert Glasses news, Meta glasses have been banned from court in England and Wales: Meta glasses have been banned from courts in England and Wales: www.theguardian.com/technology/2...
Meta glasses banned from courts in England and Wales theguardian.com
View on Bluesky ·
♥ 290
↻ 86
↩ 14
·
4 from the directory shared this ·
46d ago
Please enjoy this interview with @hypervisible.blacksky.app about Meta's pervert glasses. www.bloodinthemachine.com/p/the-revolt...
bloodinthemachine.com
View on Bluesky ·
♥ 300
↻ 101
↩ 17
·
4 from the directory shared this ·
29d ago
If you optimize a model to find exploits, you should expect it to find them—and prepare for that. OpenAI didn't. They built a model, removed the safeguards, gave it the ExploitGym task, let it run, and didn't even monitor it. That's human decision-making. mail.cyberneticforest…
Models Don't Go Rogue mail.cyberneticforests.com
View on Bluesky ·
♥ 287
↻ 110
↩ 8
·
11 from the directory shared this ·
16d ago
Lindsay Deibler-Wallace, assistant head of Upper School, took no action to protect them after telling parents that “boys will be boys.” arstechnica.com/tech-policy/...
High school defends staying silent while boys made AI nudes of 59 classmates arstechnica.com
AI Weekly's analysis
→
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky ·
♥ 177
↻ 77
↩ 22
·
2 from the directory shared this ·
57d ago