↻
Joanna Bryson reposted
Andrew Couts
@couts.bsky.social
NEW: On Thursday, @wired.com reported that Meta had quietly added code for a face recognition system to Meta AI, its smart glasses companion app. On Friday, code for the face rec system was removed. @dmehro.bsky.social and @dell.bsky.social with the scoop: www.wired.com/story/…
Meta Deletes Face-Recognition System From Its Smart Glasses App After WIRED Report wired.com
View on Bluesky →
↻
Joanna Bryson reposted
Mark Riedl
@markriedl.bsky.social
Don't overlook the importance of the "retrieval" part of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). Cornell Tech researchers find it is trivially easy to use Reddit to manipulate "deep research" AI www.404media.co/it-is-trivia...
It Is Trivially Easy to Use Reddit to Manipulate AI Search, Research Suggests 404media.co
View on Bluesky →
↻
Joanna Bryson reposted
Jack Stilgoe
@jackstilgoe.bsky.social
"The AI Bill of Rights has become one kind of infrastructure, diffuse and informal, but generative." Bad administrations can repeal good policies, but they can't stop others building on them. Superb piece, @alondra.bsky.social
A civic grammar for AI rights | Science science.org
View on Bluesky →
↻
Joanna Bryson reposted
Katie Drummond
@katie-drummond.bsky.social
Can AI do fact-checking? We asked an intrepid @wired.com fact checker to fact-check the LLMs: "According to my research, AI is even more wrong than people might think."
I’m a Professional Fact-Checker. AI Is Wrong More Often Than You Think | WIRED wired.com
View on Bluesky →
Xitters are saying Microsoft has banned use of AI because it costs more than human programmers, but this sounds like the delta between Claude & Microsoft's own AI is smaller than the value Microsoft gets from forcing its programmers to improve its AI. Have I got that right?
Microsoft reports expose AI's cost problem: The tech is more expensive than paying human employees | Fortune fortune.com
↻
Joanna Bryson reposted
Russ Poldrack
@russpoldrack.org
"Nobody needs convincing that a science of the Meaning of Life is the wrong project. I will argue that a science of phenomenal consciousness is wrong for exactly the same reason: neither is amenable to the third-person perspective science requires." by @profdata.bsky.social ar…
Consciousness, AI, and the Limits of Scientific Explanation arxiv.org
View on Bluesky →
↻
Joanna Bryson reposted
Eryk Salvaggio
@eryk.bsky.social
Anthropic’s response and influence on the encyclical is most evident in the claim that “even its creators don’t understand how it works.” In June, I wrote about what that actually means & why Anthropic says it. (Written while I was in Rome, FWIW). www.techpolicy.press/the-blac…
The Black Box Myth: What the Industry Pretends Not to Know About AI | TechPolicy.Press techpolicy.press
View on Bluesky →
↻
Joanna Bryson reposted
Simon Willison
@simon.fedi.simonwillison.net.ap.brid.gy
When I woke up this morning I didn't think I'd be spending a bunch of time today getting familiar with Catholic theology, but here we are. Notes on Pope Leo XIV's encyclical on AI. https://simonwillison.net/2026/May/25/encyclical-on-ai/
Notes on Pope Leo XIV’s encyclical on AI simonwillison.net
View on Bluesky →
Also super! arxiv.org/abs/2511.07568 ProcLLM guiding agnetic LLMs with procedural knowledge Vincent Hsiao, Mak Roberts, Leslie N. Smith ProcLLM greatly increases success rate of agentic llms on multi step tasks, very small LLM with this can exceed performance of a big, famous …
Procedural Knowledge Improves Agentic LLM Workflows arxiv.org
↻
Joanna Bryson reposted
↻
Joanna Bryson reposted
Pavel
@spavel.bsky.social
AI boosters claim that LLMs are the future of software development. But that could not be further from the truth. LLMs are the apotheosis of a paradigm 40 years in the making: the tech industry assigns you problems and then sells you the solutions. But that world is now coming…
AI is not the future of software development, but the last dying gasp of the past productpicnic.beehiiv.com
View on Bluesky →
Integrating Counterfactual Simulations with Language Models for Explaining Multi-Agent Behaviour Bálint Gyevnár, Christopher G. Lucas, Stefano V. Albrecht, Shay B. Cohen arxiv.org/abs/2505.17801 #AAMAS
arxiv.org