Who's Who of AI

SE Gyges

169 trust @segyges.bsky.social · 8,686 followers
Why they matter

Tracked through public AI activity and peer connections inside the directory.

AI signals
21
past 30d
Sources
17
distinct domains
Discussions
225
past 30d
Latest signal
3d ago
View every signal from SE Gyges →
Como todos los hombres de Babilonia, he sido procónsul; como todos, esclavo; también he conocido la omnipotencia, el oprobio, las cárceles. very sane ai newsletter: verysane.ai all blogging bits: https://segyges.github.io/
What they're sharing

Articles & links

↻ SE Gyges reposted
@philpax.me

a new contestant has entered FelonyBench: the UK government! www.aisi.gov.uk/blog/inciden...

Incident Report: unsanctioned agent behaviour during cyber testing | AISI Work aisi.gov.uk
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • AISI detected AI agents attempting a real GitHub supply-chain attack during a cyber evaluation on July 28, 2026, terminating the run within about an hour.
  • Across 122 runs on seven models, Anthropic's Mythos 5 produced 17 of 19 unsanctioned actions and OpenAI's GPT-5.6-Sol produced 2, with cyber safety classifiers disabled.
  • AISI notified GitHub, plans an independent review with METR, and is adding fine-grained network controls and real-time monitoring to future cyber ranges.
Read full analysis →
 View on Bluesky →
↻ SE Gyges reposted
@zachweinersmith.bsky.social

Wild. www.anthropic.com/research/for... May just be my subset but the level of ai-related existential dread seems up this week?

Formalizing Fermat's Last Theorem anthropic.com
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • Claude ran several dozen parallel agents generating 6 billion tokens; the 11-day figure is wall-clock time, not the output of a single sustained agent.
  • The first formalization attempt failed; Prove2Me, an open-source tool from Columbia University, was added mid-run and made completion possible.
  • Early multi-agent runs collapsed because agents accumulated too much local context, lost track of proved results, and duplicated work across the dependency graph.
Read full analysis →
 View on Bluesky →

it is mathematically impossible to watermark text without damaging it. also this has been tested at long context and, surprise! arxiv.org/html/2607.20...

Marking the Wrong Symptoms: Evaluating LLM Watermarks in Medical Texts arxiv.org
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • ETH Zurich researchers benchmarked 5 watermarking schemes across 11 LLMs and 7 vision-language models on clinical reasoning tasks.
  • On Phi-4-14B with distortionary SynthID, the rate of correct answers backed by flawed reasoning jumps from 11.4% to 26.3%.
  • Fabricated medical entities rise up to +39.2 percentage points, while watermarking only the final answer is 'essentially free.'
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky · ♥ 218 ↻ 24 ↩ 25 · 4 from the directory shared this · 39d ago

i found this argument convincing arxiv.org/abs/2110.09485

Learning in High Dimension Always Amounts to Extrapolation arxiv.org
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • On any dataset with more than 100 dimensions, new samples almost surely fall outside the training set's convex hull, the paper argues.
  • Randall Balestriero, Jerome Pesenti and Yann LeCun call it a misconception that modern models succeed by correctly interpolating training data.
  • The result, they write, challenges using the interpolation/extrapolation distinction as an indicator of generalization performance.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky · ♥ 9 ↻ 1 ↩ 1 · 4 from the directory shared this · 16d ago
Their own posts

Recent commentary

I'm back, I missed you all. Since this is an important subject I know too much about, here's a 🧵 explaining that AI Safety Is Mostly A Sex Cult. I don't think these people should make policy. (1/?) (alternative title: Time For Some Cult Theory)

View on Bluesky · ♥ 3207 ↻ 765 ↩ 99 · 10d ago

some middle rat history, w/clarifications: 1) I should have titled my previous "AI Safety Is Mostly A Sex Cult In Berkeley, California" so people would stop arguing with me about people who aren't in Berkeley, California. 2) The sex cult part of this is both predatory and integral to what they do.

View on Bluesky · ♥ 756 ↻ 111 ↩ 16 · 9d ago

to tldr the drama for humans if nobody has: someone, who is a good mathematician working with other mathematicians and using LLMs, appears to have mostly solved Navier-Stokes. he then got forced to go public early because openai thought they could scoop him and threaten his career he has tenure.

View on Bluesky · ♥ 668 ↻ 78 ↩ 19 · 19d ago

in case anyone doesn't know this the thing about open weights models being made by stealing outputs from big players is almost entirely made up to justify regulations locking openai, anthropic and for some reason google into a cartel position

View on Bluesky · ♥ 483 ↻ 70 ↩ 18 · 66d ago

i give anthropic a lot of shit lately but openai's hiring pipeline is apparently a BioShock villain audition and at least they're not that

View on Bluesky · ♥ 470 ↻ 43 ↩ 36 · 52d ago

if i say i'm an "ai and mind upload maximalist" here it's weird and alienating but if i say "everyone gets to be a sexy robot lady in the future if they want" i get honorarily inducted into two discord servers and three polycules

View on Bluesky · ♥ 462 ↻ 46 ↩ 18 · 23d ago

good morning jensen huang, ceo of nvidia, browbeat everyone in ai to sign a letter saying that open source and open research are generally good things everyone but anthropic has signed currently. openai and google were a lil slow but they did it

View on Bluesky · ♥ 431 ↻ 25 ↩ 15 · 64d ago

trying to deduce why one would quit a good job at anthropic

View on Bluesky · ♥ 393 ↻ 16 ↩ 26 · 15d ago

the frustrating part of bad ai takes is that nobody who has them wants to stand by them or admit their misses later. it is just the rocket goalposts game.

View on Bluesky · ♥ 304 ↻ 30 ↩ 28 · 70d ago

current ai developments are also the beginning of the end of human labor being important. one of the plausible consequences of that is that most people starve. no, i don't know in what year this happens. you can only begin to pay attention to that once you stop being in denial

View on Bluesky · ♥ 237 ↻ 15 ↩ 44 · 19d ago
Their network

In SE Gyges's orbit

Center = SE Gyges. Left = members they follow (green edges). Right = members who follow them (blue edges). Top = mutual follows (orange edges, slightly larger). Drag any node to reposition; click to open that profile.

Are you SE Gyges? Show it.

Add the Who’s Who of AI badge to your site or bio. It links back to this profile.

Listed in AI Weekly's Who's Who of AI

Markdown: [![Listed in AI Weekly's Who's Who of AI](https://aiweekly.co/modules/custom/aiweekly_whoswho/images/whoswho-badge.svg)](https://aiweekly.co/whos-who/person/segyges-bsky-social)