this is one of the most insane fucking things i have ever read www.amnesty.org/en/documents...
Who's Who of AI
rev. howard arson
god created him and demanded that he die
What they're sharing
Unlawful by design: Exposing the human rights costs of generative AI - Amnesty International amnesty.org
No, Artificial Intelligence Is Not Conscious theatlantic.com
Ed Zitron Gets Paid to Love AI. He Also Gets Paid to Hate AI wired.com
Adversarial attacks on neural networks through canonical Riemannian foliations arxiv.org
Articles & links
i think there's an actual question embedded in the "if Claude were representing Genghis Khan and Julius Caesar, would we say that it was really the thing itself?" hypothetical, and it is "should an actor playing Brutus be permitted to stab Caesar to death on stage."
www.wired.com/story/ai-pr-...
so something like "bounded surprisal under the Fisher metric between the up and down projections of a MLP" seems like it might be a quick way to norm the worst kind of attacks back into doing something reasonable. arxiv.org/abs/2203.00922
Their own posts
Recent commentary
the child porn AI monomaniacally dedicated to the world's first trillionaire, who once controlled the US government and has killed a million people
it is incredibly weird that the Hypnerotomachia Poliphili exists, a book which i only know about because a LLM compared Piranesi to it
it is crazy how many information theory papers in machine learning assume a noiseless real-valued channel. that isn't information theory. that's just measure theory in a hat.
i think that it's kind of weird to see writers and artists crowing about the fact that AI is not useful in their field, something which both i and they were hoping was not true
Their network
In rev. howard arson's orbit
Center = rev. howard arson. Left = members they follow (green edges). Right = members who follow them (blue edges). Top = mutual follows (orange edges, slightly larger). Drag any node to reposition; click to open that profile.