No spam, ever. We'll never share your email address and you can opt out at any time. Already a subscriber? Log in
One more thing @tuhinchakr.bsky.social 's post reminded me of... people tend to rationalize and see things not there. We saw it already in GPT-2 stories - we *expect* things to *mean* something, so we tend to see things that are not there... (link to this old paper: aclantholo…
LLMs are not conscious. They do not have a perfect sense of embodiment. They are autoregressive models that generate text by sampling, more or less, from a very large pile of things other people wrote. Read my first essay on Substack 👇 tuhinchakrabarty.substack.com/p/ai-slop-g…
Had a great time speaking with @bcmerchant.bsky.social and @vauhinivara.bsky.social about the current state of AI –– how Anthropic convinced the media that it's the industry's "ethical" leader, and how AI writing is creeping into journalism and literature: www.wnycstudios.org/…
Online Link : timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/toi-ed...
Ran some 🧪 to 🔬 why the Granta short story was certainly 🤖 generated. A lot of bad writing happens because AI hasn’t learned aesthetics. It has simply memorized the whole internet and called it a day. So sure, maybe you don't trust AI detectors. But you can trust your own eyes. #AISlop
For @timesofindianews.bsky.social I wrote about why we desperately need to rely on accurate AI detectors to prevent this slopocalypse. Yes @pangram.com is the best AI detector we’ve got and blanket statements like detectors don’t work are not backed by empirical evidence but isolated anecdotes
Center = Tuhin Chakrabarty. Left = members they follow (green edges). Right = members who follow them (blue edges). Top = mutual follows (orange edges, slightly larger). Drag any node to reposition; click to open that profile.