Our paper can be found at the link below : arxiv.org/pdf/2607.20349 Many many thanks to friends at @pangram.com @max.pangram.com @jennarussell.bsky.social @bradleyemi.bsky.social for their encouragement and support with this research 💕
Who's Who of AI
Tuhin Chakrabarty
Why they matter
Researcher with public evidence across Culture, work & education, AI research.
- AI signals
- 7 past 30d
- Sources
- 4 distinct domains
- Discussions
- 4 past 30d
- Latest signal
- 13h ago
Assistant Prof @sbucompsc @stonybrooku.
Researcher → @SFResearch
Ph.D. → @ColumbiaCompSci
Human Centered AI / Future of Work / AI & Creativity
What they're sharing
arxiv.org
aclanthology.org
View on Bluesky →
AI-slop , GrantaGate and Bad Writing tuhinchakrabarty.substack.com
Is This What Comes After AI Slop? theatlantic.com
View on Bluesky →
How Anthropic Became Holier Than Thou | On the Media | WNYC Studios wnycstudios.org
View on Bluesky →
Is This What Comes After AI Slop? theatlantic.com
View on Bluesky →
AI-slop , GrantaGate and Bad Writing tuhinchakrabarty.substack.com
Is This What Comes After AI Slop? theatlantic.com
View on Bluesky →
The Most Famous AI Writing Tic Is Also the Most Mysterious — The Atlantic apple.news
View on Bluesky →
A Twist in This Year’s Strangest Literary AI Scandal theatlantic.com
View on Bluesky →
How do we spot AI slop? Lessons from the Granta controversy timesofindia.indiatimes.com
Articles & links
Tuhin Chakrabarty reposted
One more thing @tuhinchakr.bsky.social 's post reminded me of... people tend to rationalize and see things not there. We saw it already in GPT-2 stories - we *expect* things to *mean* something, so we tend to see things that are not there... (link to this old paper: aclantholo…
LLMs are not conscious. They do not have a perfect sense of embodiment. They are autoregressive models that generate text by sampling, more or less, from a very large pile of things other people wrote. Read my first essay on Substack 👇 tuhinchakrabarty.substack.com/p/ai-slop-g…
Tuhin Chakrabarty reposted
AI-assisted fiction is already here, tons of people are reading it, very few of them realize it, and no one wants to talk about it. Gift link to my latest: www.theatlantic.com/technology/2...
Tuhin Chakrabarty reposted
Had a great time speaking with @bcmerchant.bsky.social and @vauhinivara.bsky.social about the current state of AI –– how Anthropic convinced the media that it's the industry's "ethical" leader, and how AI writing is creeping into journalism and literature: www.wnycstudios.org/…
Tuhin Chakrabarty reposted
Until recently, AI fiction has been easy to dismiss as slop—but not anymore, @willoremus.com writes. He reports on how "Daggermouth," a best-selling romance novel, is raising uncomfortable questions about the future of writing:
Yes I wrote a substack on this a few months ago open.substack.com/pub/tuhincha...
Tuhin Chakrabarty reposted
"If a book as beloved as Daggermouth were written with a chatbot, it would raise an awkward question: Could AI fiction be getting … good?" Fascinating one by @willoremus.com www.theatlantic.com/technology/2...
Tuhin Chakrabarty reposted
AI writing Isn’t just annoying. It’s teaching itself to be annoying. @willoremus.com on negative parallelism. apple.news/A9qbSji1yRHW...
Tuhin Chakrabarty reposted
Another @willoremus.com banger: an interview with Jamir Nazir, the winner of the Commonwealth Prize — published in Granta — accused of using AI. 🤯
Online Link : timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/toi-ed...
Their own posts
Recent commentary
🚨 New paper on AI & Copyright Using @pangram.com full-text AI detection, we study self-published genre fiction on Amazon, 2023–26. Amazon is flooded w/ books with substantial AI text. They earn real 💰 & crowd out non-AI books. w/ @dhillonp.bsky.social @xinyuel.bsky.social & Jane Ginsburg (1/n) 🧵
Ran some 🧪 to 🔬 why the Granta short story was certainly 🤖 generated. A lot of bad writing happens because AI hasn’t learned aesthetics. It has simply memorized the whole internet and called it a day. So sure, maybe you don't trust AI detectors. But you can trust your own eyes. #AISlop
For @timesofindianews.bsky.social I wrote about why we desperately need to rely on accurate AI detectors to prevent this slopocalypse. Yes @pangram.com is the best AI detector we’ve got and blanket statements like detectors don’t work are not backed by empirical evidence but isolated anecdotes
Their network
In Tuhin Chakrabarty's orbit
Center = Tuhin Chakrabarty. Left = members they follow (green edges). Right = members who follow them (blue edges). Top = mutual follows (orange edges, slightly larger). Drag any node to reposition; click to open that profile.