Join free with your email
Free. No spam, ever โ we'll never share your email address and you can opt out at any time. Already a subscriber? Log in
Researcher with public evidence across AI research.
Work is here: arxiv.org/abs/2606.11021, done with @dippedrusk.com, @martinmundt.bsky.social, @arjunsubgraph.bsky.social, @jordant.bsky.social, @willie-agnew.bsky.social, @dchechel.bsky.social, Franziska Sofia Hafner, @a-lauscher.bsky.social.
Automated AI benchmarks are often well-specified and easy to implement and run, and I feel this contributes to their spread in policy and industry despite have many limitations, especially when try to assess human interactions. Can we design and specify human in the loop evaluations like this?
I don't think an NSFW AI model can ever be safe or ethical. Even if it is somehow trained on consensual data, the risk of people generating media of other people nonconsensually is too high, not to mention that this is the explicit goal of many users.
Center = Willie Agnew. Left = members they follow (green edges). Right = members who follow them (blue edges). Top = mutual follows (orange edges, slightly larger). Drag any node to reposition; click to open that profile.