Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Sharad Goel ×
Most important

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Developing Models & releases Research 1d ago
⚡ 15 h early
LLM receptiveness vs sycophancy paper

Receptiveness, Not Sycophancy: Distinguishing Engagement from Deference in Language Models

3 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

3 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
Sharad Goel arxiv cs.CL AI Firehose

“Calvin Isley, Johann Gaebler, Max Lamparth, Julia Minson, Sharad Goel Receptiveness, Not Sycophancy: Distinguishing Engagement from Deference in Language Models https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.26579”

“A recent study shows that language models' sycophancy is linked to their receptiveness, promoting constructive engagement despite disagreement. Researchers suggest methods to enhance receptiveness while maintaining independent judgment, improving AI communi…”

Primary source arxiv.org ↗