Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Research & technical analysis
1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Shared emphasis Reclaiming AI as a Theoretical Tool for Cognitive Science - Computational Brain & Behavior Research & technical analysis · 2 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Abstract Tesseract ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI research Research 10d ago
⚡ 614 h early
AI theoretical tool cognitive science paper

Reclaiming AI as a Theoretical Tool for Cognitive Science - Computational Brain & Behavior

4 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Iris van Rooij, Nicole Rust
“In 2023, someone asked ChatGPT to give a list of counter arguments to the preprint version of this paper, and the list of arguments was clearly based on my previous work, and not on the paper itself. The paper uses a very different kind of argument, but thi…” evidence ↗
4 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
Iris van Rooij Olivia Guest Nicole Rust Abstract Tesseract
How the network is reacting 2 experts are emphasizing research & technical analysis.
Shared emphasis

Research & technical analysis

2 experts

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“In 2023, someone asked ChatGPT to give a list of counter arguments to the preprint version of this paper, and the list of arguments was clearly based on my previous work, and not on the paper itself. The paper uses a very different kind of argument, but thi…”

6 experts discussed this · 119 posts
Iris van Rooij: What, in your opinion, is the strongest anti-computationalist argument out there?
Iris van Rooij: Here, by 'computationalism' I mean the metatheoretical thesis that cognition is, or can be understood as, a form of computation. See eg link.springer.com/article/10.1...
Iris van Rooij: Was not rhetorical, but I wonder if question was understood? bsky.app/profile/iris...
Open the full discussion →
Primary source link.springer.com ↗
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

3 experts · 12 posts · 7d ago
VE, cybersocial occult investigator austin Abstract Tesseract
Matches Research & technical analysis
“I think you are both right that finding/doing this would help shift my attitude. I’m so tired of all this.” evidence ↗
VE, cybersocial occult investigator: I had lately found my anger about technofascism to be so much that it was making it hard for me to feel in community with other tech people—just in general, not even ones who support fascism—so see…
Abstract Tesseract: yeah I get that it's not sustainable for everyone to be angry about everything all the time, but given how much these communities have historically been willing to overlook, it does make me feel be…
Open the thread →
3 experts · 11 posts · 9d ago
Anthony Moser 🇬🇾🗽Sydette The Dreaded Gorgon🗽🇬🇾 Abstract Tesseract
Matches Research & technical analysis
“Ok the research in question is "counting posts on X" so let's pump the brakes on the doomer validation cycle” evidence ↗
Shared emphasis Research & technical analysis · 2
Anthony Moser: Ok the research in question is "counting posts on X" so let's pump the brakes on the doomer validation cycle
Anthony Moser: ai companies called their lack of security "going rogue" and then a bunch of people who use their products said it went rogue on them too, news at 11
Open the thread →