Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Clear
Showing signals surfaced by Sam Barrett, PhD ×

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; expert reactions remain attributable.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

3 experts · 11 posts · 5d ago
Daniel Lowd: Me doing ML research in 2026 by passing notes between Codex and Claude Code. *switch to Codex's iTerm2 tab* › Thanks! Some notes from Claude: [...] (...wait...) *switch to Claude's iTerm 2 tab* › T…
Martin Trapp: Me doing ML research in 2026 by passing notes between Codex and Claude Code. *switch to Codex's iTerm2 tab* › Thanks! Some notes from Claude: [...] (...wait...) *switch to Claude's iTerm 2 tab* › T…
Open the thread →
4 experts · 9 posts · 14d ago
brennan: having a lot of conversations lately with various friends where AI people are complaining about their non-AI coworkers who are doing things slower and worse than could be done e.g. 20 minute tasks …
Mark J. Nelson: I have a friend in a totally normal office job like this, increasingly annoyed that people are doing repetitive tasks in Excel completely manually & missing a row, manually typing in data from rece…
Open the thread →
3 experts · 4 posts · 18d ago
Sam Barrett, PhD: "NYT journos are not truth machines. They are prior engines. It's not just that they don't fact check to make sure they are factually correct or that they fail to do so in certain instances. They c…
Sam Barrett, PhD: Intelligence and being informed on a particular topic, amd epistemology in general dont necessarily track each other. Unfortunately instead of having a taboo about writing from a position of being …
Open the thread →