Daniel Lowd

377 trust researcher @lowd.cc · 4,426 followers
Why they matter

Researcher with public evidence across AI research.

AI signals
5
past 30d
Sources
4
distinct domains
Discussions
15
past 30d
Latest signal
4h ago
View every signal from Daniel Lowd →
CS Prof at the University of Oregon, studying adversarial machine learning, data poisoning, interpretable AI, probabilistic and relational models, and more. Avid unicyclist and occasional singer-songwriter. He/him

Articles & links

Daniel Lowd reposted
@dame.is

I’m reading the Pope’s 83-page manifesto on AI. Notes/quotes 🧵 “Technology should not be considered, in itself, as a force antagonistic to humanity. On the contrary, it has formed part of our history since the beginning as ‘a profoundly human reality, linked to the autonomy & …

Encyclical Letter of His Holiness Leo XIV Magnifica Humanitas (15 May 2026) vatican.va
AI Weekly's analysis
  • Pope Leo XIV's 42,300-word Magnifica Humanitas, signed May 15 and published May 25, addresses AI as the central challenge to human dignity.
  • The encyclical states AI systems are 'cultivated' not 'built' and explicitly denies they possess experience, a body, or the capacity to feel pain.
  • Anthropic co-founder Chris Olah spoke at the Vatican's May 25 presentation alongside theologians and three cardinals.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky →
Daniel Lowd reposted
Ethan Mollick @emollick.bsky.social

Interesting study. There is, as everyone expected, a flood of AI books. And it is crowding out human authors: "No-AI books, on their own, earn less per book than they did in 2023 in 7 of 8 genres. The one genre where human authors are doing better (+35%) is Fantasy/horror" arx…

arxiv.org View on Bluesky →

Recent commentary

who wrote this code? it's Opus. it's literally 4.8. it's Fable delegating to Sonnet. it's GPT 5.6-terra on xhigh. terra is basically 5.5 luna on max. it's GLM. dude it's a Qwen distill. it's Larch. run Larch. log onto Larch. dive into Larch. Larch has tokens for you. Larch has tokens for you.

View on Bluesky · ♥ 179 ↻ 28 ↩ 5 · 14d ago

Me doing ML research in 2026 by passing notes between Codex and Claude Code. *switch to Codex's iTerm2 tab* › Thanks! Some notes from Claude: [...] (...wait...) *switch to Claude's iTerm 2 tab* › Thanks! Here's Codex's response: [...]

View on Bluesky · ♥ 39 ↻ 1 ↩ 6 · 12d ago

(Meeting a new couple) “So, which of you is the GPT and which of you is the Claude?”

View on Bluesky · ♥ 12 ↻ 1 ↩ 10 · 17d ago

I saw “AI fail” on the grocery list, but it turns out we’re just out of aluminum foil and I have bad handwriting.

View on Bluesky · ♥ 3 ↻ 2 ↩ 0 · 10d ago

Wow, the new ChatGPT desktop app sucks so much more than I realized at first. Web UI is ok. CLI is ok. Desktop app? May as well be BonziBuddy.

View on Bluesky · ♥ 3 ↻ 0 ↩ 1 · 9d ago

Stop replacing HUMANS with AI!! For example, if you can't code and you're tempted to ask AI, you could instead ask a HUMAN software engineer for help. And then that HUMAN software engineer will ask AI to write the code. See how much better that is? Yay for HUMANS!

View on Bluesky · ♥ 0 ↻ 0 ↩ 0 · 55d ago

In Daniel Lowd's orbit

Center = Daniel Lowd. Left = members they follow (green edges). Right = members who follow them (blue edges). Top = mutual follows (orange edges, slightly larger). Drag any node to reposition; click to open that profile.