Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Sam Barrett, PhD ×

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

4 experts · 21 posts · 4d ago
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Research & technical analysis · 1 Opportunity & adoption · 1
Eugene Vinitsky: It takes so long to write a paper because we are crazy about not making mistakes and checking as many edge cases as we can. This stressful responsibility is, I suppose, not obvious. so, if you’re n…
Eugene Vinitsky: Lots of new folks trying to write papers so it’s important to know: if there’s a mistake in the paper, the responsibility falls on you. You cannot offload it to the AI assistant.
Open the thread →
2 experts · 2 posts · 2d ago
Multiple readings Building & implementation · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Sam Barrett, PhD: Ironically AI could lead to more fun and high quality easter eggs because developers can spend more time on the idea than the fiddly bits of the implementation.
Daniel Lowd: "...it's time for a reset." Agreed! Then I'll have even more tokens to use! (I'm sure that's what she meant, right?)
Open the thread →