Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Clear
Showing signals surfaced by Alison Gopnik ×

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; expert reactions remain attributable.

Established AI field signal Resource 14d ago
⚡ 87 h early
arxiv preprint archive resource

arXiv.org e-Print archive

5 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

5 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered

“👆 A paranoid LLM is ofc worse. This is just tuning a prior belief up or down. I guess you could self distill additional context for the train data e.g. "you know arxiv.org is such and such" or "this is an unknown source" with the hope it generalises (and al…”

“Two new preprints from the lab, First up, causal exploration in humans and LLM's. arxiv.org Human Adults and LLMs as Scientists: Who Benefits from Active Exploration?”

Established AI field signal Resource 7d ago
Humanist Review AI publication launch

Home

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered

“My piece in this impressive and fascinating compilation of distinguished social scientists, artists and humanists thinking about AI. Stone soup, the Golem and and the intelligences of exploration and care. humanistreview.ai”