Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Opportunity & adoption reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by Andrew Curran ×

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Developing AI field signal Signal 1d ago

Sam altman decoded interview ai

12 experts across 4 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Opportunity & adoption reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Mark Riedl, Justin Hendrix
“Altman: “we believe that the world should accept some bad things happening for the benefits of this technology and people having the agency.” www.politico.com/news/2026/10... Well, that’s something that always ends well, I’m sure.” evidence ↗
12 experts 4 communities 1 sources clustered
2 experts discussed this · 10 posts
e.w. niedermeyer: he really does look like he's about to step off into a bold new future with none of us in it
Mary Branscombe: Right over the cliff
e.w. niedermeyer: the new Vanity Fair cover seems to subtly propose an interesting possibility: perhaps Sam Altman just has to accept some bad things happening in the name of human flourishing? www.politico.com/news…
Open the full discussion →