Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Questions & unknowns reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Questions & unknowns
0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by John Warner ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

4 experts · 33 posts · 14d ago
Shannon Vallor Matthew Kirschenbaum ae John Warner
Matches Questions & unknowns
“That’s the caricature we’re meant to construct, clearly. Are we really to believe she was rendered incapable of talking to her child because of . . . AI? Like really and literally? I know that’s th…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Markets & investment · 1 Opportunity & adoption · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Matthew Kirschenbaum: Based on the NYT, which (afaik) is all we have to go on, Mayer “felt overwhelmed by the range and complexity of potential answers.” You can make of this what you will, including that it is disingen…
ae: it also just sounds like -- surprise -- someone used AI on a homework assignment. which it was, for the parent. i am not really sure the prompt is really as innocent in context as it appears in the…
Open the thread →
3 experts · 31 posts · 16d ago
Emily M. Bender Anthony Moser John Warner
Matches Questions & unknowns
“I'm not "people." I'm a person. Why not talk to the person in front of view (virtually) about the caveats?” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Context & explanation · 1
Anthony Moser: "ai" discourse exploits our social patterns. we don't owe polite consideration to people who are rudely barging into every private space at once you don't need to grant the premise that it's good f…
Anthony Moser: at this point anyone claiming "ai" is in any way good or worthwhile needs to define what they mean and make an affirmative argument for it make people defend what they believe. and if you don't bel…
Open the thread →
3 experts · 6 posts · 20d ago
Benjamin Riley John Warner Jane Rosenzweig
Matches Questions & unknowns
“Dear wealthy and powerful corporations, I will come tell you what Ethan Mollick tells you for 1/10th of whatever he charges. I was 20 months ahead of him on humans AI. What are you afraid of?” evidence ↗
John Warner: Dear wealthy and powerful corporations, I will come tell you what Ethan Mollick tells you for 1/10th of whatever he charges. I was 20 months ahead of him on humans AI. What are you afraid of?
Benjamin Riley: Child of the 90s resurfaces: Sellout
Open the thread →