Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Concern & critique Opportunity & adoption
1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Live tension Sam altman decoded interview ai Concern & critique · 4 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Roland Meyer ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Signal 12d ago
⚡ 2 h early

Sam altman decoded interview ai

12 experts across 4 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Damien Williams, Dare Obasanjo
“Remember when us phil-tech types said effective altruism was just utilitarianism taken to its worst possible extents? This is what we meant: Real harm for unquantifiable potential benefit. "…'we believe that the world should accept some bad things happening…” evidence ↗
12 experts 4 communities 1 sources clustered
Mark Riedl Justin Hendrix Hypervisible Damien Williams Drew Harwell steven t. piantadosi Dare Obasanjo e.w. niedermeyer +4
2 experts discussed this · 10 posts
e.w. niedermeyer: he really does look like he's about to step off into a bold new future with none of us in it
Mary Branscombe: Right over the cliff
e.w. niedermeyer: the new Vanity Fair cover seems to subtly propose an interesting possibility: perhaps Sam Altman just has to accept some bad things happening in the name of human flourishing? www.politico.com/news…
Open the full discussion →
Primary source politico.com ↗
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

2 experts · 10 posts · 15d ago
Roland Meyer René Walter
Matches Concern & critique
“No wonder the paranoid style is having it's moment. Socmed increases the perception of (false) threats by those mechanisms of overconnection creating a general atmosphere of suspicion. Thing is, pe…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Building & implementation · 1
René Walter: No wonder the paranoid style is having it's moment. Socmed increases the perception of (false) threats by those mechanisms of overconnection creating a general atmosphere of suspicion. Thing is, pe…
Roland Meyer: «Explicit, though not transparent» is key here: You can endlessly gather evidence for suspicious connections without establishing criteria for their relevance or settling on their meaning. As both …
Open the thread →
2 experts · 5 posts · 14d ago
Prof. Dr Beth Singler Roland Meyer
Matches Concern & critique
“Do you have examples you could share? I am starting some work on AI psychosis 'diagnosis' as a discursive object, specifically with regard to spiritual beliefs.” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Roland Meyer: I am reading your interpretations of contemporary politics, of AI and of society in general in which you use paranoia, schizophrenia, psychosis, … in psychoanalysis these terms always refer to the …
Roland Meyer: Subjects are effects of media, and their ability to work on their syptoms thus obviously depends on the media used?
Open the thread →