Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

6 experts · 35 posts · 2d ago
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Building & implementation · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Erin Kissane: So am I just looking in the wrong places, or has the US left entirely whiffed building advocacy for [whatever we're calling competitive compatibility/adversarial interop now] in preparation for ret…
Luis Villa: @kissane.myatproto.social I have not seen anything; have not been specifically looking but does feel like it would have come across my radar. @tabularaza.net might have seen something?
Open the thread →
3 experts · 4 posts · 6d ago
Dr. Johnathan Flowers, Bisexual of the Blade (Alt-text or DIE): Forever angry that there are some useful non -AI tools that have rebranded as AI for sweet, sweet clout.
Dr. Johnathan Flowers, Bisexual of the Blade (Alt-text or DIE): Your photo editing software isn’t “AI powered:” it’s doing the same shit it did a decade ago with a shiny AI label.
Open the thread →