Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by brennan ×
Most important

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

3 experts · 13 posts · 12d ago
austin brennan mackuba.eu
Shared emphasis Building & implementation · 2
austin: ymmv, I think this is broadly a good thing. it increases demand for independent verification of claims. the status quo wasn’t actually that great! we should want there to be a higher bar (and AI ma…
austin: my clue is that it was the only one with a “contact us” CTA
Open the thread →
3 experts · 3 posts · 16d ago
Doll Singularity's Bounty e/cc brennan
Doll: When we say "there is no future where you work as a developer and don't use AI", we are not trying to dunk or say it's inevitable, we're saying no one's gonna pay you to do worse work that takes lo…
Singularity's Bounty e/cc: I know. People take it as some sort of preference or enthusiasm, which it can be, but it's simply a normative statement. Like, this is what to expect, adjust from there
Open the thread →
2 experts · 2 posts · 2d ago
Luis Villa brennan
brennan: you can even do it directly inside the LLM for simple parts, STL is just a binary text type that it can write natively
Luis Villa: what others said: just talk to it, STL is text. Without OpenSCAD, my son, Claude, and I did this carp skeleton quite trivially a few days before Halloween.
Open the thread →