No spam, ever. We'll never share your email address and you can opt out at any time. Already a subscriber? Log in
one of my favorite cheeky papers, from 1999, is this one where the authors argue that sometimes it is better to simply wait and do nothing, because your astrophysical simulations will complete faster if you simply wait for the next epoch of compute arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph...
How lucky are you to have been born when and where you are? Had Opus 4.8 in Claude Code whip up a new visualization of all humans who ever lived. In addition to being neat to try, it is an interesting test for an AI that combines research, code, design and stats together veil-…
Back when I was writing code, I used to wing it and sometimes come across a standards document I'd try to work in CC knows the standards deeply, and has to explain them to me Industry standards have a much weirder and powerful place in the LLM coding world
The main reason we have so many similar standards is because humans are assholes. I wonder if as we move to LLM coding the number of alternate standards we need is going to collapse
I'm having GPT read technical banter and jargon to me so I get familiar with the cadence of saying silly things for interviews like "backpressure" is a real thing