Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Prof. Dr Beth Singler ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

3 experts · 3 posts · 9d ago
Eryk Salvaggio Luke Stark Prof. Dr Beth Singler
Eryk Salvaggio: Insisting on “superintelligence” makes it look like it’s the politicized name for the tech, and as if “AI” is the neutral and objective label. That obscures the politics behind the choice to call i…
Prof. Dr Beth Singler: I had a student in his 60s who had worked in tech, but had apparently never heard of 'AI' during that time, and thought that it was at least devised as a term around 2020 🤔
Open the thread →
2 experts · 5 posts · 15d ago
Prof. Dr Beth Singler Roland Meyer
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Roland Meyer: I am reading your interpretations of contemporary politics, of AI and of society in general in which you use paranoia, schizophrenia, psychosis, … in psychoanalysis these terms always refer to the …
Roland Meyer: Subjects are effects of media, and their ability to work on their syptoms thus obviously depends on the media used?
Open the thread →