Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Christian Wolf ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

3 experts · 12 posts · 16d ago
Naomi Saphra Christian Wolf Shubhendu Trivedi
Multiple readings Building & implementation · 1 Opportunity & adoption · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Shubhendu Trivedi: The past month or so, I came across people here raising a ruckus about some articles being AI written, by people who were clearly in situations of distress and needed to write what they thought, to…
Shubhendu Trivedi: Caught this within the 6-8 minutes of scrolling, then searched for said writings, and it was broader. Some were even making it about water usage and pollution. 🤣
Open the thread →
4 experts · 5 posts · 18d ago
Maria Antoniak Ted Underwood Christian Wolf Scott McGrath
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 2 Questions & unknowns · 1
Maria Antoniak: Maybe worth saying aloud that I do worry about safety risks (hacking, bio, an “out of control” agent). I just also see those risks as deeply entangled with money, politics, personalities, regulatio…
Ted Underwood: Maybe worth saying aloud that I do worry about safety risks (hacking, bio, an “out of control” agent). I just also see those risks as deeply entangled with money, politics, personalities, regulatio…
Open the thread →
3 experts · 5 posts · 16d ago
Marc Lanctot Christian Wolf David Picard
Reaction converging Research & technical analysis · 3
David Picard: 6 papers to review for ICLR. Fair game. It's a lot, but I understand I have to contribute, sure. But 16 days to do it is just bad. I won't be able to deliver the best review I can do in such a shor…
Christian Wolf: I have only 3 but now I receive invites from ACs to receive additional papers.... ?!?
Open the thread →
3 experts · 3 posts · 7d ago
Emily M. Bender Olivia Guest Christian Wolf
Emily M. Bender: Yes, because it is really important to smoke, try heroin, download CSAM (!!!), or burn plastic, etc etc to be able to discuss the dangers and harms of those activities.
Olivia Guest: Yes, because it is really important to smoke, try heroin, download CSAM (!!!), or burn plastic, etc etc to be able to discuss the dangers and harms of those activities.
Open the thread →
2 experts · 5 posts · 5d ago
Clément Canonne Christian Wolf
Shared emphasis Research & technical analysis · 2
Christian Wolf: Karma does exist. Reviewing AI slop papers is our punishment for having invented this technology. Please kill me.
Christian Wolf: What is the current nettiquette? As a reviewer, can I claim that the paper has been written with too much LLM output?
Open the thread →