Join free with your email
Free. No spam, ever — we'll never share your email address and you can opt out at any time. Already a subscriber? Log in
What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.
Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.
No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.
One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.
3 directory members surfaced this signal.
“feeling really burned out, so I redrew the computer in the top and bottom to be a bit haunted 😌”
“🧵A shout-out to @olivia.science whose marvellous work in progress, 'Critical Computer' I highly recommended - critical.computer”
5 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.
“Periodically I re-share this. Thank you for writing it, @anthonymoser.com. anthonymoser.github.io/writing/ai/h...”
2 directory members surfaced this signal.
“We discuss climate change and the hydrocarbon cartel; Microsoft is a key factor and force multiplier in enabling extraction and burning: www.microsoft.com/en-us/ai/ene...”
2 directory members surfaced this signal.
“We talk about the imposition of 'AI' in education. Microsoft, using its decades-old market dominance is the most practiced at coopting educators and shaping institutions: www.microsoft.com/en-us/educat...”
2 directory members surfaced this signal.
“We correctly note Palantir's role as the tech stack for state surveillance but Microsoft has long been there: www.microsoft.com/en-us/ai/def...”
2 directory members surfaced this signal.
“Five years ago, I stated a book with the working title of Attack Mannequins'. The book's theme: the promotion of 'AI' is an anti-worker psyop. The idea was introduced here: monroelab.com/2021/09/19/a...”