Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by Vincent Conitzer ×

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Resource 6d ago
⚡ 215 h early
America.gov US government resource

America.gov

25 experts across 5 network communities independently surfaced this.

25 experts 5 communities 1 sources clustered
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 3 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Policy & governance

2 experts

Rules, institutions and accountability.

“America.gov does not do pronouns. Any pronouns. (Courtesy of my daughter!) aifails.substack.com/p/pronouns”

Concern & critique

1 expert

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“Jessica Ji weighed in on the new #AI-powered https://t.co/sEHIhq7mvb website for @USATODAY, saying that it can be a useful resource for people trying to navigate U.S. government websites. She also notes its risks: “When this kind of AI system is empowered t…”

Building & implementation

1 expert

How teams are shipping and applying it.

“The chatbot comes as an expansion of the Office of Personnel Management’s work to modernize access to public federal workforce data. Integration with America.gov is planned. www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SUx... Read more by @madialder.bsky.social: fedscoop.com/o…”

2 experts discussed this · 3 posts
Julian Sanchez: Ok wow. This is both extensive and deeply surreal. Tell America.gov to Play Minecraft.
Julian Sanchez: Amusingly, the chatbot appears to be unable to recognize that it said anything weird. It “thinks” it just responded that it can’t play minecraft.
Justin Hendrix: Weird
Open the full discussion →
Developing Safety & security Research 1d ago
AI safety fundamental impossibility results paper

Fundamental Impossibility Results in AI Safety: Trading Off between Desiderata

2 experts are actively discussing the implications.

1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered

“Our new paper led by Ida Mattsson on the game-theoretic limits that an assistant faces when trying to be both helpful and not harmful, when it doesn't know who it is talking to. arxiv.org/abs/2610.27373”

2 experts discussed this · 2 posts
Vincent Conitzer: Our new paper led by Ida Mattsson on the game-theoretic limits that an assistant faces when trying to be both helpful and not harmful, when it doesn't know who it is talking to. arxiv.org/abs/2610.…
David Manheim: Awesome result; definitely need to cite this in the multi-agent risks paper I'm drafting.
Open the full discussion →
Established AI field signal Signal 3d ago

RSI cannot lead to AGI

2 experts are actively discussing the implications.

1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered

“It seems that at least AI Overview will not kick off an intelligence explosion. (Or is this a case of “nothing to see here”?) aifails.substack.com/p/rsi-cannot...”

2 experts discussed this · 2 posts
Vincent Conitzer: It seems that at least AI Overview will not kick off an intelligence explosion. (Or is this a case of “nothing to see here”?) aifails.substack.com/p/rsi-cannot...
Suresh Venkatasubramanian: it is true that my hand starts to hurt whenever I hear RSI surface in policy debates
Open the full discussion →