Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by coty.bsky.social ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

7 experts · 93 posts · 1d ago
Ryan Moulton jake rev. howard arson Doll Isaiah Bishop Singularity's Bounty e/cc coty.bsky.social
Reaction converging Questions & unknowns · 3 Opportunity & adoption · 1
Doll: A serious weakness in the “sufficiently intelligent AI inevitably wages war on humanity” story is that it needs to explain why conquest beats purchasing, contracting, and participating.
Doll: Violence creates resistance, destroys useful assets, interrupts supply chains, and makes everyone spend resources defending against you. Cooperation lets you benefit from capabilities you never had…
Open the thread →
5 experts · 35 posts · 5d ago
joao Grace Colin coty.bsky.social david-p-reichert.bsky.social
Colin: There are indeed thousands of LessWrong posts, as well as papers and books, which make a particular theoretical case for why AI will kill us all that many people find convincing. I'm going to try t…
Colin: First of all, we must just agree off the bat that a superintelligent AI will be able to kill us all. After all it is superintelligent. As this random dude who became famous 3 days ago because of a …
Open the thread →
5 experts · 41 posts · 9d ago
Tim Kellogg Dustin Moskovitz jake coty.bsky.social david-p-reichert.bsky.social
Reaction converging Concern & critique · 4 Questions & unknowns · 1
Tim Kellogg: perspective. i’m not sure if i agree or disagree. but he’s thought about it, so..
jake: yeah, and @david-p-reichert.bsky.social thinks about it more than I do, professionally, so probably listen to him more than I (I do still wish The Professionals published lists of various guestimat…
Open the thread →
6 experts · 16 posts · 8d ago
Chris Paxton SE Gyges jake Marco Z austin coty.bsky.social
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Policy & governance · 1
SE Gyges: it's a cold day in hell, i agree with David Sacks
SE Gyges: it would be great if they all instituted actual, reasonable audits by actually neutral parties. i don't care if they slow down, and probably prefer they don't. i don't actually believe either thing…
Open the thread →
4 experts · 11 posts · 12h ago
Colin tweety fish ae coty.bsky.social
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Opportunity & adoption · 1
Colin: Kinda disagree. Jev may or may not itself be a big deal but to me it represents a first step in a good direction which is models that use the kind of generalized intelligence of LLMs but not in ord…
Colin: I feel we are wasting some time, effort, and resources on making sure that Claude is a certain kind of guy when really all we need are the facts that he knows.
Open the thread →
3 experts · 20 posts · 14h ago
Colin tj mahr 🤘 coty.bsky.social
Colin: Alright. Let me resolve this once and for all. The simple fact is that there are a few different things that can be reasonably meant by “thinking” and mixing them up is what’s making everyone mad.
Colin: One is, “that thing people do with our brains when we are awake”. Whatever LLMs do, I think it bears at best a superficial resemblance to this in its entirety. Implying that LLMs do this makes some…
Open the thread →
4 experts · 23 posts · 7d ago
SE Gyges David Marx tachikoma coty.bsky.social
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 2 Policy & governance · 1
tachikoma: who is directing these open model to take down water plants, and why is the effort not spent on stopping them? there are plenty of technologies that can be used to cause harm, in almost no cases is…
David Marx: what's this about attacks on water infra?
Open the thread →
4 experts · 10 posts · 8d ago
jake Colin Singularity's Bounty e/cc coty.bsky.social
Multiple readings Building & implementation · 2 Concern & critique · 1
Colin: Perhaps the focus could be less on the “pace” of development and more on the direction of development. Like, make it illegal to develop cybercriminal hackerbots, at any pace.
Colin: I feel like the whole “pace” thing takes this teleological view of AI progress towards some known eventual state of “superintelligence” whereas the way models act is actually highly contingent on t…
Open the thread →