Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by Chris Paxton ×

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Compute & infrastructure Research 18d ago
⚡ 6 h early
latent reasoning recurrent depth test-time compute paper

Scaling up Test-Time Compute with Latent Reasoning: A Recurrent Depth Approach

3 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

3 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
How the network is reacting 2 experts are emphasizing research & technical analysis.
Shared emphasis

Research & technical analysis

2 experts

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“OpenAI’s Astra may be using Recurrent Depth as outlined in this paper: Scaling up Test-Time Compute with Latent Reasoning: A Recurrent Depth Approach (arxiv.org/abs/2502.05171)”

Established AI field signal Development 11d ago
⚡ 2 h early
Meta Muse Wonder model launch

Muse Wonder

4 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

4 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
How the network is reacting 3 experts are independently emphasizing research & technical analysis.
Reaction converging

Research & technical analysis

3 experts

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“Looks like Meta is back at the frontier with their latest "Muse Wonder" models. Will be interesting to see independent evaluations / user testing. research.meta.ai/blog/muse-wo...”

2 experts discussed this · 5 posts
Sung Kim: Meta's Muse Wonder Muse Wonder = Muse Wonder Flash Muse Wonder Full = Muse Wonder so confusing... research.meta.ai/blog/muse-wo...
Nafnlaus 🇮🇸 🇺🇦: All for the pun...
Nafnlaus 🇮🇸 🇺🇦: Not sure how much I'd trust that.. my experience with Spark 1.3 and Spark 1.3 contributor has been... subpar vs. what the benchmarks suggest
Open the full discussion →
Established Agents & robotics Analysis 13d ago
practical applications human soul essay

Practical Applications of the Human Soul

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

2 experts 1 community 1 sources clustered

“I wrote this short post on the nature and purpose of consciousness, and why I think personally AI will likely be self-aware if we continue to try to make it useful, through the lens of what why I think self-awareness is adaptive: cpaxton.substack.com/p/prac…”

Established Agents & robotics Analysis 11d ago
IROS 2026 robotics dexterity essay

Dexterity is the Frontier: Thoughts on IROS 2026

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered

“Some thoughts on a robotics conference: the research community increasingly is looking at enabling contact-rich manipulation with dexterous hands, and has the tools to do so itcanthink.substack.com/p/dexterity-...”

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

3 experts · 3 posts · 6d ago
Multiple readings Research & technical analysis · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Chris Paxton: The solution to interpretability is clearly the same as the solution to ai coding: just ask deepseek if claude did what it said it did, they can't BOTH be lying to you
Eugene Vinitsky: Okay fine they both lied but if I ask 3 models it’s all good then we can do majority vote
Open the thread →